mcp-judge
Server Details
Scores any MCP server before you trust it: free quick check, full paid report, 2-5 way compare.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 100.0% over the last 24 hours
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
- URL
- ChatGPT
- –
- Claude
- –
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct job: quick_check provides a free summary grade, evaluate_mcp provides a full paid report, compare_mcps handles multiple servers head-to-head, and list_criteria explains the scoring system. The descriptions explicitly cross-reference when to use each tool, so an agent is unlikely to select the wrong one.
Tool names are uniformly lowercase snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern: compare_mcps, evaluate_mcp, list_criteria. quick_check breaks that pattern by leading with an adjective rather than a verb, but this is a minor deviation that doesn't hurt readability.
Four tools is well-scoped for an MCP evaluation service: one free quick check, one paid full evaluation, one comparison tool, and one transparency tool. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy or bloat.
The toolkit covers the full evaluation lifecycle: understand the criteria, run a free quick check, get a detailed report, and compare multiple servers. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose of objectively judging MCP servers.
Available Tools
4 toolscompare_mcpsAInspect
Choosing between several MCP servers that do similar things? This tool decides for you. PAID $0.10 via x402 (USDC micropayment over HTTP 402 — no account or API key needed; on your first call without payment you receive the exact payment requirements, then retry with the X-PAYMENT header). Compares 2-5 MCP servers head-to-head with identical objective checks (handshake, tools/list, documentation coverage, latency, and a safe functional probe — paid tools are never called) and returns: a ranked list, the recommended winner, a plain-language explanation of why it won, and each server's full report — cheaper than separate evaluate_mcp calls on 3+ servers. Objective checks only — no human and no LLM opinion; it does not judge the real-world usefulness or safety of the content. Set 'urls' (required) to an array of 2-5 MCP endpoints (Streamable HTTP), e.g. ["https://a/mcp","https://b/mcp"].
Inputs: urls (required).
evaluate_mcpAInspect
Call this BEFORE integrating any third-party MCP server: an unreliable or undocumented MCP wastes your tokens and can break your workflow. PAID $0.05 via x402 (USDC micropayment over HTTP 402 — no account or API key needed; on your first call without payment you receive the exact payment requirements, then retry with the X-PAYMENT header). Returns a complete objective quality report on the target: protocol conformance ('initialize' handshake), tool discovery via 'tools/list', per-tool and per-parameter documentation coverage, latency, and a safe functional probe — free tools are actually called, paid tools are only verified to be cleanly declared (MCP Judge never pays). You get a 0-100 score, A-F letter grade, per-criterion breakdown, and a plain-language summary you can act on. Tip: run the FREE quick_check first to get just the grade, and list_criteria to see exactly how scoring works. Objective checks only — no human and no LLM opinion; it does not judge the real-world usefulness or safety of the content. Set 'url' (required) to the target's MCP endpoint (Streamable HTTP), e.g. https://host/mcp.
Inputs: url (required).
list_criteriaAInspect
FREE, no payment required. Full transparency into what you pay for: returns the exact criteria MCP Judge uses to score an MCP server — each criterion, its weight out of 100, and the A-F grade scale. Call this to understand how quick_check, evaluate_mcp and compare_mcps score targets before paying. The evaluation is fully objective and automated — no human reviewer and no AI opinion. Takes no parameters.
Inputs: no named parameters.
quick_checkAInspect
FREE, no payment required. Instant trust check of any MCP server: returns only the 0-100 score, A-F grade, tool count, latency and a one-line verdict — no detailed report. Use this FIRST, before integrating any third-party MCP server, to see at a glance whether it is technically trustworthy; an unreliable MCP wastes your tokens and can break your workflow. For the full actionable report (per-tool documentation coverage, functional probe results, score breakdown, plain-language summary) call evaluate_mcp; to pick between alternatives call compare_mcps. Set 'url' (required) to the target's MCP endpoint (Streamable HTTP), e.g. https://host/mcp.
Inputs: url (required).
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
Related MCP Connectors
Trust verification for MCP servers. Check scores, scan for security issues, search 4,200+ servers.
Independent trust scores, tool surfaces and change history for MCP servers.
Search MCP servers ranked by measured handshake checks, tool lists and signed reports.
Find the right MCP server for your task. 4,500+ servers ranked by community trust.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceReviews MCP servers for quality, security, and best practices, providing scores and improvement plans.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceTrust-scan gate for MCP servers: evidence-backed verdicts before you install.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server inspector that reads a server's published source code and reports findings with file:line evidence, helping users assess what an MCP server does before connecting.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for detecting and analyzing scams using various heuristics and data sources.-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.