mcp-judge

Each tool has a clearly distinct job: quick_check provides a free summary grade, evaluate_mcp provides a full paid report, compare_mcps handles multiple servers head-to-head, and list_criteria explains the scoring system. The descriptions explicitly cross-reference when to use each tool, so an agent is unlikely to select the wrong one.

Tool names are uniformly lowercase snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern: compare_mcps, evaluate_mcp, list_criteria. quick_check breaks that pattern by leading with an adjective rather than a verb, but this is a minor deviation that doesn't hurt readability.

Four tools is well-scoped for an MCP evaluation service: one free quick check, one paid full evaluation, one comparison tool, and one transparency tool. Each tool earns its place with no redundancy or bloat.

The toolkit covers the full evaluation lifecycle: understand the criteria, run a free quick check, get a detailed report, and compare multiple servers. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose of objectively judging MCP servers.