Skip to main content
Glama

Jean — Molecular Biology & Genomics

crispr_design_guides

Read-only

Design and score CRISPR guides on the subject — on/off-target scores, QC flags, and cloning-enzyme conflicts.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
_filesNoThe project: record references shaped like _subject. Their records become library documents a tool names in sequences/parts/document; a trace or alignment is found by file name.
_subjectNoThe record to act on: exactly one of sequence, accession (+source), sample (an id from list_samples) or file ({name, text} or {name, base64}); record_index picks one record of several.
min_stemNominimum self-complementary stem to report. In nt. Advanced.
nucleaseNothe nuclease (PAM + spacer length) to scan for. Values: SpCas9 (SpCas9: NGG (3')), SpCas9-NG (SpCas9-NG: NG (3')), SpG (SpG: NGN (3')), SpRY (SpRY: NRN (3')), xCas9 (xCas9: NG (3')), SaCas9 (SaCas9: NNGRRT (3')), SaCas9-KKH (SaCas9-KKH: NNNRRT (3')), AsCas12a (AsCas12a: TTTV (5')), LbCas12a (LbCas12a: TTTV (5')), enAsCas12a (enAsCas12a: TTTV (5')).SpCas9
region_endNorestrict results to guides ending at/before this position. In bp. Advanced.
region_startNorestrict results to guides starting at/after this position (0-based). In bp. Advanced.
restriction_enzymesNocloning enzymes whose recognition site must NOT appear in the spacer. Advanced.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countYesguides passing the region filter
guidesYesthe designed guides, scored
regionYesthe window the guides were filtered to, resolved: start, end, and whether it is the whole molecule. Reported because `region_start`/`region_end` are optional and their default is the molecule's length, which a caller holding only this result does not have — without it, `count` of `totalCandidates` cannot be read
topSpacerYesspacer of the highest-ranked guide
totalCandidatesYescandidates found before filtering

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / region
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "the window the guides were filtered to, resolved: start, end, and whether it is the whole molecule. Reported because `region_start`/`region_end` are optional and their default is the molecule's length, which a caller holding only this result does not have — without it, `count` of `totalCandidates` cannot be read"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "guides",
      -  "count",
      -  "totalCandidates",
      -  "topSpacer"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "guides",
      +  "count",
      +  "totalCandidates",
      +  "topSpacer",
      +  "region"
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds that scoring covers on/off-target, QC flags, and cloning-enzyme conflicts, which is genuine behavioral context, but it does not state the scale of the off-target search or any limits, and the output schema already defines return values.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler; the design/score verb pair comes first and the output types follow. It is efficient, though the trailing clause is slightly list-like.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 7 parameters, a nested _subject object, full schema coverage, annotations, and an output schema, the definition is technically callable as-is. What is missing is the routing context — when this design/score step is preferred over sibling CRISPR design and off-target tools — which matters given the dense sibling set.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, including nuclease PAM/spacer semantics and the 'Advanced' flags, so the schema carries the parameter burden. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond it, which is the baseline case.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb+resource ('Design and score CRISPR guides on the subject') and names the outputs (on/off-target scores, QC flags, cloning-enzyme conflicts). It does not, however, distinguish this from near-neighbours like crispr_design_library, screen_guides, or crispr_score_deephf, which an agent must pick between.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative routing. The phrase 'on the subject' only implies the input is a record, and nothing tells the agent whether to reach for this instead of crispr_design_library or search_off_targets.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources