Agent Commerce Guard
Server Details
Policy review and purchase discovery for AI-agent commerce actions.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- fxjim/agent-commerce-guard
- GitHub Stars
- 0
- Server Listing
- agent-commerce-guard
Available Tools
1 toolreview_agent_commerce_actionsReview agent commerce actionsARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Review up to five non-sensitive public AI-agent actions for approval and evidence requirements. This tool does not execute, pay, sign, deploy, post, or reveal purchase instructions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| actions | Yes | Actions to review. Do not submit secrets, private source, or customer data. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds behavioral context by explicitly listing actions the tool does not perform (execute, pay, sign, deploy, post, reveal), which reinforces safety and provides clarity beyond the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, each serving a distinct purpose: first defines the core function, second lists key exclusions. No wasted words, front-loaded with essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low complexity (1 param, no output schema, no siblings), the description adequately covers purpose, input constraints, and exclusions. However, it does not explain what 'evidence requirements' entails or the form of the review output, leaving minor gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions, but the tool description adds important context: limiting to non-sensitive public actions and a maximum of five. This expands on the schema's generic 'actions' parameter, adding meaning about content and scale.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Review' and the resource 'non-sensitive public AI-agent actions' with a specific scope (up to five). It explicitly lists actions the tool does NOT perform, distinguishing its role. With no sibling tools, differentiation is not needed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implicitly guides usage by stating exclusions (does not execute, pay, etc.), indicating this is a pre-execution review tool. However, it lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, but the clarity of exclusions compensates partially.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
AI agent product discovery via open marketplace. Search, compare and discover advertiser products.
Product discovery for AI agents: ranked products and bundles from the open merchant web.
Shopify product discovery and x402-paid offer verification for AI agents.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to browse product catalogs and make purchases through a policy engine that enforces spending limits, requires human approval for certain amounts, and logs all actions to an audit trail.
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to browse catalogs, manage carts, check out, and make payments via Shopify and Razorpay under user-defined policies and explicit approval, while maintaining a complete audit trail.

Periskop MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform product discovery from natural language shopping intents, returning ranked products with merchant links without completing checkout.MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to provide e-commerce customer service with product search, RAG-based FAQ answers, human handoff, and automated security auditing with a review workflow.
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion with other tools. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct.
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (review_agent_commerce_actions), so there is no inconsistency.
A single tool is far too few for a server claiming to be a 'commerce guard'. The tool only reviews actions and does not handle execution, approval flow, or sensitive actions, making the scope extremely narrow.
The tool is severely limited: it only reviews non-sensitive public actions up to five. There are obvious gaps such as handling sensitive actions, executing approved actions, or managing more than five actions, leaving the domain largely uncovered.