Decide Policy Notaries

Name: Decide Policy Notaries
Author: decidefyi

Server Details

Fail-closed refund, cancellation, return, and trial checks for 100 US subscription vendors.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership by verifying the domain or GitHub account it belongs to. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.

Status: Healthy
Uptime: 99.9% over 56 days
Last Tested: 2026-10-14 19:51
Transport: Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
URL
Repository: decidefyi/decide
GitHub Stars: 1
Server Listing: decide

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored 2026-10-06 01:30 across 4 tools

Disambiguation3/5

The tools target distinct policy questions, but refund_eligibility and return_eligibility are very close in meaning for subscription purchases, both evaluating whether money can be recovered or a purchase reversed. Cancellation_penalty and trial_terms are clearer, but the overlap between refund and return creates a real risk of misselection.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case noun-phrase pattern: cancellation_penalty, refund_eligibility, return_eligibility, trial_terms. The naming is predictable and readable throughout.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is a well-scoped set for a focused policy-decision server covering cancellation, refund, return, and trial scenarios. Each tool appears to earn its place without excessive surface area.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the main subscription policy decision points: cancellation terms, refunds, returns, and trials. Minor gaps may exist for related areas like auto-renewal or vendor-specific escalation paths, but core workflows are represented.

Available Tools

4 tools

cancellation_penaltyCheck cancellation penaltyA

Read-onlyIdempotent

Inspect

Check US subscription cancellation terms without executing cancellation. Known vendors include review-only and retired scopes: their presence is not automation support. Adobe requires manual contract review. Typeform requires Basic, direct/self-serve platform scope and returns CANCEL_AT_PERIOD_END, not an immediate cancellation or refund. Missing scope, retired sources or unavailable current evidence return UNKNOWN.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`plan`	Yes	Use 'basic' for Typeform; 'individual' for other supported vendors.
`region`	Yes	Region code. Currently only 'US' is supported.
`vendor`	Yes	Vendor identifier (lowercase, underscore-separated).
`product`	No	Required for Typeform. Excludes payments collected from form respondents.
`contract_type`	No	Required for Typeform. Custom and enterprise contracts are not covered.
`billing_cadence`	No	Required when the vendor applies different cancellation terms to monthly and annual plans.
`purchase_channel`	No	Required for Typeform. Third-party purchases are not covered.
`requested_action`	No	Required for Typeform. Checks ending renewal at the paid term end; does not execute it.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`code`	Yes
`policy`	No
`refund`	No
`vendor`	No
`message`	Yes
`penalty`	No
`verdict`	Yes
`notice_days`	No
`source_hash`	No
`evaluated_at`	No
`rules_version`	No
`policy_version`	No
`automation_safe`	No
`billing_cadence`	No
`policy_evidence`	No
`rulebook_result`	No
`required_context`	No
`policy_source_url`	No
`execution_performed`	No
`policy_last_checked`	No
`policy_source_notes`	No
`cancellation_confirmed`	No
`cancellation_effective`	No
`policy_last_verified_utc`	No

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, and the description adds genuine behavioral context: it does not execute cancellation, Typeform returns CANCEL_AT_PERIOD_END rather than an immediate cancel or refund, and missing scope yields UNKNOWN. This goes meaningfully beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, which is good. The middle sentences are dense jargon ('review-only and retired scopes: their presence is not automation support') that is cryptic and may not earn its place without further explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return-value detail is not required, and the description still communicates the key return semantics (UNKNOWN, CANCEL_AT_PERIOD_END). For an 8-parameter tool with full schema coverage, it is largely complete, though it leaves the 'review-only/retired scope' concept undefined.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds value by tying parameters together in natural language ('Typeform requires Basic, direct/self-serve platform scope'), clarifying how the enum values must be combined rather than just listing them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Check US subscription cancellation terms') and immediately bounds it with 'without executing cancellation'. It is clearly distinct in scope from siblings like refund_eligibility and trial_terms, though it never names those siblings to route the agent explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It conveys usage limits well (Adobe is manual-only, Typeform needs specific scope, unavailable evidence returns UNKNOWN), which helps the agent interpret results. However, it gives no explicit when-to-use-this-vs-alternative guidance relative to the sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

refund_eligibilityCheck refund eligibilityA

Read-onlyIdempotent

Inspect

Evaluate a US consumer subscription refund against versioned source-backed rules. Returns UNKNOWN when required conditions are absent or the vendor requires approval or manual policy review.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`plan`	Yes	Plan type. Currently only 'individual' plans are supported.
`region`	Yes	Region code. Currently only 'US' is supported.
`vendor`	Yes	Vendor identifier (lowercase, underscore-separated).
`days_since_purchase`	Yes	Number of days since the subscription was purchased.
`qualifying_conditions_met`	No	Required when the vendor policy has source-specific conditions such as first purchase, unused benefits, or an eligible annual plan.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`code`	Yes
`vendor`	No
`message`	Yes
`verdict`	Yes
`refundable`	No
`source_hash`	No
`window_days`	No
`evaluated_at`	No
`rules_version`	No
`policy_version`	No
`automation_safe`	No
`policy_evidence`	No
`rulebook_result`	No
`required_context`	No
`policy_source_url`	No
`days_since_purchase`	No
`policy_last_checked`	No
`policy_source_notes`	No
`policy_last_verified_utc`	No

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-open-world), so the bar is lower. The description adds real behavioral value by disclosing the UNKNOWN outcome path — absent conditions or vendor-approval/manual-review cases — which tells the agent results may be tri-state rather than a clean boolean.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly written sentences, purpose front-loaded, with the UNKNOWN behavior as the supporting clause. No filler or repetition of structured fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be explained, and the description covers scope (US consumer subscriptions), rule provenance, and the UNKNOWN case. The one real gap is absent routing guidance against the sibling eligibility/penalty/trial tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so vendor/plan/region/days_since_purchase are fully documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter-level detail beyond a loose allusion to "required conditions," which only faintly maps to qualifying_conditions_met; baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ("Evaluate") and resource ("a US consumer subscription refund against versioned source-backed rules"), which is far more precise than the title. The subject matter implicitly separates it from cancellation_penalty and trial_terms, but it never names or distinguishes the close sibling return_eligibility.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains what happens when conditions are unmet, but gives no when-to-use guidance and no routing versus return_eligibility, cancellation_penalty or trial_terms. The agent must infer selection from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

return_eligibilityCheck return eligibilityB

Read-onlyIdempotent

Inspect

Evaluate whether a US consumer subscription purchase can be reversed under versioned source-backed rules. Returns UNKNOWN when required conditions are absent or manual review is required.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`plan`	Yes	Plan type. Currently only 'individual' plans are supported.
`region`	Yes	Region code. Currently only 'US' is supported.
`vendor`	Yes	Vendor identifier (lowercase, underscore-separated).
`days_since_purchase`	Yes	Number of days since the subscription was purchased.
`qualifying_conditions_met`	No	Required when the vendor policy has source-specific conditions such as first purchase, unused benefits, or an eligible annual plan.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`code`	Yes
`method`	No
`vendor`	No
`message`	Yes
`verdict`	Yes
`returnable`	No
`return_type`	No
`source_hash`	No
`evaluated_at`	No
`rules_version`	No
`policy_version`	No
`automation_safe`	No
`policy_evidence`	No
`rulebook_result`	No
`required_context`	No
`policy_source_url`	No
`return_window_days`	No
`days_since_purchase`	No
`policy_last_checked`	No
`policy_source_notes`	No
`policy_last_verified_utc`	No

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the operation read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds one genuinely useful behavioral note, the UNKNOWN fallback when conditions are absent or manual review is required, but nothing about the versioned-rule sourcing or what triggers manual review.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose and followed by the key output caveat; nothing is wasted. Slightly terse for the disambiguation burden this tool carries, but structurally clean.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be re-explained, and annotations cover the safety profile. However, the description does not disambiguate from the near-identical sibling refund_eligibility, which is the main thing an agent needs in this family.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all five parameters including the enum constraints and the conditional nature of qualifying_conditions_met. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Evaluate') and resource ('whether a US consumer subscription purchase can be reversed'). The scope is clear, but it never distinguishes itself from the sibling refund_eligibility, which reads almost identically to an agent choosing between them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance and no mention of the obvious alternatives (refund_eligibility, cancellation_penalty, trial_terms). An agent must infer which sibling applies from the name alone, which is risky given how similar these four are.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

trial_termsCheck trial termsA

Read-onlyIdempotent

Inspect

Evaluate a live US consumer subscription trial offer. Supply observed availability, duration, card, and auto-conversion facts; the tool returns UNKNOWN instead of inferring current offers from static data.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`plan`	Yes	Plan type. Currently only 'individual' plans are supported.
`region`	Yes	Region code. Currently only 'US' is supported.
`vendor`	Yes	Vendor identifier (lowercase, underscore-separated).
`offer_confirmed`	No	For account- or promotion-specific trials, whether a live offer has been confirmed for this account.
`observed_trial_days`	No	Trial duration shown by the confirmed live offer. Required when offer_confirmed is true for a variable offer.
`observed_auto_converts`	No	Whether the confirmed live offer converts to a paid subscription after the trial.
`observed_card_required`	No	Whether the confirmed live offer requires a payment card.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`code`	Yes
`vendor`	No
`message`	Yes
`verdict`	Yes
`trial_days`	No
`source_hash`	No
`evaluated_at`	No
`auto_converts`	No
`card_required`	No
`rules_version`	No
`policy_version`	No
`automation_safe`	No
`policy_evidence`	No
`rulebook_result`	No
`trial_available`	No
`required_context`	No
`policy_source_url`	No
`policy_last_checked`	No
`policy_source_notes`	No
`policy_last_verified_utc`	No

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover safety (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive) and closed-world scope, so the description does not need to restate them. It adds a genuinely non-obvious behavioral trait: the tool returns UNKNOWN rather than inferring current offers from static data, which tells the agent not to expect a best-guess fallback.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler: the first establishes purpose and scope, the second establishes the input contract and the UNKNOWN behavior. Purpose is front-loaded ahead of the secondary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With seven parameters, full schema coverage, an output schema, and rich annotations, the description only needs to carry purpose and the distinctive UNKNOWN fallback behavior, which it does. It could note the account- or promotion-specific nature of certain trials more explicitly, but nothing critical to calling it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the enum constraints, required fields, and per-parameter meanings are fully documented in the schema. The description restates the observed fact categories (availability, duration, card, auto-conversion) but adds no format or dependency detail beyond that, which fits the baseline 3 when the schema does the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (evaluate) and resource (live US consumer subscription trial offer), which cleanly separates it from cancellation_penalty, refund_eligibility, and return_eligibility. It also signals an input requirement (observed facts). It stops short of naming how it differs from those siblings directly, but the resource scope is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it (you must have observed availability, duration, card, and auto-conversion facts) and the condition where the tool is appropriate versus guessing from static data. However, it never explicitly routes the agent to or away from the sibling tools, so usage is only implicitly framed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

4 tool updatesOct 6, 2026
- Changedcancellation_penalty1 field changed
  - changedOutput schema / properties / policy_last_verified_utc / type
```
Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```
- Changedrefund_eligibility1 field changed
  - changedOutput schema / properties / policy_last_verified_utc / type
```
Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```
- Changedreturn_eligibility1 field changed
  - changedOutput schema / properties / policy_last_verified_utc / type
```
Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```
- Changedtrial_terms1 field changed
  - changedOutput schema / properties / policy_last_verified_utc / type
```
Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

1 tool updateSep 6, 2026

Changedcancellation_penalty12 fields changed

addedInput schema / properties / contract_type

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Required for Typeform. Custom and enterprise contracts are not covered.",
+  "enum": [
+    "self_serve"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedInput schema / properties / plan / description

Previous value: -"Plan type. Currently only 'individual' plans are supported."New value: +"Use 'basic' for Typeform; 'individual' for other supported vendors."

changedInput schema / properties / plan / enum

Previous value: -[
-  "individual"
-]New value: +[
+  "individual",
+  "basic"
+]

addedInput schema / properties / product

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Required for Typeform. Excludes payments collected from form respondents.",
+  "enum": [
+    "platform_subscription"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / purchase_channel

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Required for Typeform. Third-party purchases are not covered.",
+  "enum": [
+    "direct"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / requested_action

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Required for Typeform. Checks ending renewal at the paid term end; does not execute it.",
+  "enum": [
+    "cancel_at_period_end"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedInput schema / properties / vendor / enum

Previous value: -[
-  "1password",
-  "adobe",
-  "amazon_music_unlimited",
-  "amazon_prime",
-  "amc_plus",
-  "apple_app_store",
-  "apple_arcade",
-  "apple_music",
-  "apple_tv_plus",
-  "audible",
-  "bitwarden",
-  "britbox",
-  "bumble",
-  "calm",
-  "canva",
-  "chatgpt_plus",
-  "claude_pro",
-  "coursera_plus",
-  "crunchyroll",
-  "dashlane",
-  "deezer",
-  "discord_nitro",
-  "discovery_plus",
-  "disney_plus",
-  "doordash_dashpass",
-  "dropbox_us",
-  "duolingo",
-  "ea_play",
-  "espn_plus",
-  "evernote",
-  "expressvpn",
-  "figma",
-  "fitbit_premium",
-  "fubo_tv",
-  "github_pro",
-  "google_one",
-  "google_play",
-  "grammarly",
-  "headspace",
-  "hellofresh",
-  "hinge",
-  "hulu",
-  "icloud_plus",
-  "instacart_plus",
-  "keeper",
-  "kindle_unlimited",
-  "lastpass",
-  "linkedin_premium",
-  "masterclass",
-  "max",
-  "microsoft_365",
-  "midjourney",
-  "mlb_tv",
-  "myfitnesspal_premium",
-  "netflix",
-  "new_york_times",
-  "nfl_plus",
-  "nintendo_switch_online",
-  "noom",
-  "nordvpn",
-  "notion",
-  "paramount_plus",
-  "patreon",
-  "peacock",
-  "peloton",
-  "playstation_plus",
-  "proton",
-  "reddit_premium",
-  "ring_protect",
-  "roblox_premium",
-  "scribd",
-  "shutterstock",
-  "siriusxm",
-  "slack",
-  "sling_tv",
-  "snapchat_plus",
-  "soundcloud_go",
-  "spotify",
-  "squarespace",
-  "starz",
-  "strava",
-  "substack",
-  "surfshark",
-  "telegram_premium",
-  "tidal",
-  "tinder",
-  "todoist",
-  "twitch",
-  "uber_one",
-  "ubisoft_plus",
-  "wall_street_journal",
-  "walmart_plus",
-  "washington_post",
-  "weightwatchers",
-  "wix",
-  "x_premium",
-  "xbox_game_pass",
-  "youtube_premium",
-  "youtube_tv",
-  "zoom"
-]New value: +[
+  "1password",
+  "adobe",
+  "amazon_music_unlimited",
+  "amazon_prime",
+  "amc_plus",
+  "apple_app_store",
+  "apple_arcade",
+  "apple_music",
+  "apple_tv_plus",
+  "audible",
+  "bitwarden",
+  "britbox",
+  "bumble",
+  "calm",
+  "canva",
+  "chatgpt_plus",
+  "claude_pro",
+  "coursera_plus",
+  "crunchyroll",
+  "dashlane",
+  "deezer",
+  "discord_nitro",
+  "discovery_plus",
+  "disney_plus",
+  "doordash_dashpass",
+  "dropbox_us",
+  "duolingo",
+  "ea_play",
+  "espn_plus",
+  "evernote",
+  "expressvpn",
+  "figma",
+  "fitbit_premium",
+  "fubo_tv",
+  "github_pro",
+  "google_one",
+  "google_play",
+  "grammarly",
+  "headspace",
+  "hellofresh",
+  "hinge",
+  "hulu",
+  "icloud_plus",
+  "instacart_plus",
+  "keeper",
+  "kindle_unlimited",
+  "lastpass",
+  "linkedin_premium",
+  "masterclass",
+  "max",
+  "microsoft_365",
+  "midjourney",
+  "mlb_tv",
+  "myfitnesspal_premium",
+  "netflix",
+  "new_york_times",
+  "nfl_plus",
+  "nintendo_switch_online",
+  "noom",
+  "nordvpn",
+  "notion",
+  "paramount_plus",
+  "patreon",
+  "peacock",
+  "peloton",
+  "playstation_plus",
+  "proton",
+  "reddit_premium",
+  "ring_protect",
+  "roblox_premium",
+  "scribd",
+  "shutterstock",
+  "siriusxm",
+  "slack",
+  "sling_tv",
+  "snapchat_plus",
+  "soundcloud_go",
+  "spotify",
+  "squarespace",
+  "starz",
+  "strava",
+  "substack",
+  "surfshark",
+  "telegram_premium",
+  "tidal",
+  "tinder",
+  "todoist",
+  "twitch",
+  "typeform",
+  "uber_one",
+  "ubisoft_plus",
+  "wall_street_journal",
+  "walmart_plus",
+  "washington_post",
+  "weightwatchers",
+  "wix",
+  "x_premium",
+  "xbox_game_pass",
+  "youtube_premium",
+  "youtube_tv",
+  "zoom"
+]

addedOutput schema / properties / cancellation_confirmed

Added value: +{
+  "const": false,
+  "type": "boolean"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / cancellation_effective

Added value: +{
+  "enum": [
+    "paid_term_end"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / execution_performed

Added value: +{
+  "const": false,
+  "type": "boolean"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / refund

Added value: +{
+  "enum": [
+    "not_evaluated"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedOutput schema / properties / verdict / enum

Previous value: -[
-  "FREE_CANCEL",
-  "PENALTY",
-  "LOCKED",
-  "UNKNOWN"
-]New value: +[
+  "FREE_CANCEL",
+  "CANCEL_AT_PERIOD_END",
+  "PENALTY",
+  "LOCKED",
+  "UNKNOWN"
+]

4 tool updatesSep 6, 2026

Changedcancellation_penalty3 fields changed

addedOutput schema / properties / automation_safe
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```

changedOutput schema / properties / billing_cadence / type

Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]

addedOutput schema / properties / policy_evidence

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "properties": {
+    "checked_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "current": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "evaluated_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "policy": {
+      "enum": [
+        "refund",
+        "cancel",
+        "return",
+        "trial"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "policy_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "reason": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "schema_version": {
+      "enum": [
+        "policy_evidence_v1"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "snapshot_generated_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "snapshot_hash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_hash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_url": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "enum": [
+        "current",
+        "expired",
+        "unavailable",
+        "review_required"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "valid_until": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "vendor": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "verified_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "schema_version",
+    "policy",
+    "vendor",
+    "status",
+    "reason",
+    "current",
+    "evaluated_at"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Changedrefund_eligibility3 fields changed

addedOutput schema / properties / automation_safe
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / policy_evidence

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "properties": {
+    "checked_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "current": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "evaluated_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "policy": {
+      "enum": [
+        "refund",
+        "cancel",
+        "return",
+        "trial"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "policy_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "reason": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "schema_version": {
+      "enum": [
+        "policy_evidence_v1"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "snapshot_generated_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "snapshot_hash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_hash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_url": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "enum": [
+        "current",
+        "expired",
+        "unavailable",
+        "review_required"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "valid_until": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "vendor": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "verified_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "schema_version",
+    "policy",
+    "vendor",
+    "status",
+    "reason",
+    "current",
+    "evaluated_at"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

changedOutput schema / properties / refundable / type

Previous value: -"boolean"New value: +[
+  "boolean",
+  "null"
+]

Changedreturn_eligibility3 fields changed

addedOutput schema / properties / automation_safe
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / policy_evidence

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "properties": {
+    "checked_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "current": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "evaluated_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "policy": {
+      "enum": [
+        "refund",
+        "cancel",
+        "return",
+        "trial"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "policy_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "reason": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "schema_version": {
+      "enum": [
+        "policy_evidence_v1"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "snapshot_generated_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "snapshot_hash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_hash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_url": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "enum": [
+        "current",
+        "expired",
+        "unavailable",
+        "review_required"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "valid_until": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "vendor": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "verified_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "schema_version",
+    "policy",
+    "vendor",
+    "status",
+    "reason",
+    "current",
+    "evaluated_at"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

changedOutput schema / properties / returnable / type

Previous value: -"boolean"New value: +[
+  "boolean",
+  "null"
+]

Changedtrial_terms2 fields changed

addedOutput schema / properties / automation_safe
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / policy_evidence

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "properties": {
+    "checked_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "current": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "evaluated_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "policy": {
+      "enum": [
+        "refund",
+        "cancel",
+        "return",
+        "trial"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "policy_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "reason": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "schema_version": {
+      "enum": [
+        "policy_evidence_v1"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "snapshot_generated_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "snapshot_hash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_hash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source_url": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "enum": [
+        "current",
+        "expired",
+        "unavailable",
+        "review_required"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "valid_until": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "vendor": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "verified_at": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "schema_version",
+    "policy",
+    "vendor",
+    "status",
+    "reason",
+    "current",
+    "evaluated_at"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

1 tool updateJul 16, 2026

Changedtrial_terms2 fields changed

addedInput schema / properties / observed_auto_converts

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Whether the confirmed live offer converts to a paid subscription after the trial.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / observed_card_required

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Whether the confirmed live offer requires a payment card.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}

4 tool updatesJul 16, 2026
- First observedcancellation_penalty
- First observedrefund_eligibility
- First observedreturn_eligibility
- First observedtrial_terms

Related MCP Connectors

renewal-matrix A
com.edgethirteen.www
Score a subscription cancellation flow against federal, CA, CO, VT, and OR click-to-cancel laws.
Legal & Compliance Payments & Billing
1
renewalmatrix A
app.vercel.renewalmatrix
Score a subscription flow against US click-to-cancel / auto-renewal laws.
Legal & Compliance
11
Woo Revenue Incident Graph A
io.github.tytutueh13-sudo
Check WooCommerce checkout-change risk using public evidence and privacy-safe store signals.
E-commerce & Retail Payments & Billing Monitoring
41
Revnuvo Trust
io.github.hardeyhemy
Verify companies, domains and counterparties before transacting. Sanctions, UBO, fraud scoring.
Legal & Compliance Finance
1

Related MCP Servers

genpark-agentic-recurrent
Payments & Billing Finance App Automation
Alpha-Park
A
license
Not graded
quality
B
maintenance
Enables agents to monitor transaction streams, detect recurring charges and price creeping, flag zombie subscriptions, and generate automated cancellation workflows.
Updated 15 days ago (2026-09-30 03:14 UTC)
7
MIT
genpark-agentic-recurrent
Finance Payments & Billing App Automation
alphaparkinc
A
license
Not graded
quality
B
maintenance
Enables autonomous detection of recurring charges, price creeping, and zombie subscriptions, then generates automated cancellation workflows through MCP-compatible tools.
Updated 15 days ago (2026-09-30 03:13 UTC)
7
MIT
ReturnCheck
E-commerce & Retail Autonomous Agents Web Scraping
mangelmartinezfer-hue
F
license
Not graded
quality
B
maintenance
Enables AI shopping agents to verify whether a specific product can be returned by supplying a product URL and buyer country, returning a verified verdict with exact policy clauses, return window, and confidence score.
Updated 3 days ago (2026-10-11 20:06 UTC)
-
AgenticPriceDropRefundArbiter
E-commerce & Retail Autonomous Agents App Automation
alphaparkinc
A
license
Not graded
quality
B
maintenance
Enables tracking post-purchase prices across Shopify, Walmart, Best Buy, and Target, detecting drops within merchant price-match windows, verifying eligibility, and synthesizing automated refund claims.
Updated 9 days ago (2026-10-06 01:24 UTC)
7
MIT