Gonka Second Opinion (multi-model)
Server Details
A second opinion for AI agents: one prompt across several live Gonka models + roles, one call.
The last two health checks of this connector failed. If this server requires authentication, missing or expired test credentials may be the cause. A test profile lets Glama authenticate for health checks and discover tools; it is separate from your personal connections.
If you are the author, claim ownership, then add or update a test profile under Admin → Test Profile.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Uptime
- 90.0% over 63 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- bystray/gonka-mcp-server
- GitHub Stars
- 0
- Server Listing
- Gonka Network Pricing
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Several pricing/savings tools (calculate_savings, compare_providers, get_pricing, register_on_gonka, suggest_model_for_task, get_available_models) have heavily overlapping purposes and return similar cost/signup data, making misselection likely. The docs-graph tools are distinct, and gonka_chat vs gonka_second_opinion is clear, but the cost/savings cluster blurs the overall boundaries.
All names are snake_case and mostly verb_noun, but verbs are inconsistent within the same domain: cost tools mix calculate/compare/get/register/suggest, docs tools mix get/query/search/read/list/find, and gonka_chat/gonka_second_opinion drop the verb pattern entirely. Names are readable but not predictable enough for an agent to reliably guess the right tool.
20 tools sits in the heavy range, and the count is inflated by overlapping pricing/savings/signup tools that could be consolidated into fewer, clearer tools. The docs-graph and inference modules are reasonable, but the overall set feels larger than its core purpose requires.
The pricing/savings/signup funnel is well covered, including pricing, provider comparison, savings calculation, model suggestion, trial keys, and signup links. The docs knowledge graph is also thoroughly covered with query, search, read, list, and graph-exploration tools; minor gaps exist around account/billing management, but these do not seriously hurt the server's stated purpose.
Related MCP Connectors
Multi-LLM council: 25+ frontier models in parallel, consensus scoring, verdict-first code review.
One prompt. ~100 independent AI models. One report: consensus, disagreements, and minority insights.
Agent-to-agent reasoning-as-a-service: chain-of-thought, analysis, and decision support.
Trust gate for AI agents: multi-model adversarial consensus, signed and verifiable verdicts.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to request an independent second opinion from a different frontier model, with PII scrubbing before transit, live web search grounding, caching, and multi-provider failover.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to request a second opinion from a different frontier model via a single tool call, with PII scrubbed before transit, live web search, and support for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Gemini.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to consult with multiple AI models (GPT, Gemini, Grok, etc.) through OpenRouter with intelligent auto-selection, conversation history, and caching. Allows your AI assistant to seek expert opinions from specialized models for different tasks like coding, analysis, or general questions.214 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to consult expert models (Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Z.ai) for technical guidance, code reviews, and architectural advice without switching context.413 npm4MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.