NextJobz Job Search
Server Details
Search jobs on NextJobz by keyword, location, work type, salary, and experience level.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolsearch_jobsAInspect
Search for jobs on NextJobz job portal. Returns paginated job listings with title, company, location, salary, skills, and deadline.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| hybrid | No | Include hybrid jobs | |
| onSite | No | Include on-site jobs | |
| pageNo | No | Page number (1-based) | |
| remote | No | Include remote jobs | |
| search | No | Job title or company keyword to search. Default searches all jobs. | |
| contract | No | Include contract jobs | |
| fullTime | No | Include full-time jobs | |
| pageSize | No | Results per page (max 20) | |
| partTime | No | Include part-time jobs | |
| toSalary | No | Maximum salary | |
| fromSalary | No | Minimum salary | |
| internship | No | Include internship jobs | |
| companyName | No | Filter by company name | |
| jobLocation | No | Filter by job location (city or country) | |
| postedFilter | No | Filter by post date: 0=Last24Hours, 1=LastWeek, 2=LastMonth, 3=Last3Months | |
| maxExperience | No | Maximum years of experience required | |
| minExperience | No | Minimum years of experience required |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. It does mention that results are paginated and lists the job fields returned, which is useful. However, it does not disclose whether filters combine with AND/OR, default sorting, or any access requirements. Some transparency is present but more context could be given.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that directly conveys purpose and the key return characteristic (paginated listings). It is concise and front-loaded, with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 17 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is somewhat brief. It covers the core search functionality and return fields, but does not mention the extensive filtering options (location, salary, experience, etc.) or pagination controls. The schema covers these details, so the description is minimally complete but could provide a better overview.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage for all 17 parameters, so the description does not need to repeat parameter details. It adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, but the baseline is 3 when schema coverage is high.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Search for jobs') and the resource ('NextJobz job portal'), and mentions the return format (paginated job listings with specific fields). No sibling tools exist, so differentiation is not required.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description clearly implies when to use the tool (whenever a user needs to search for jobs on NextJobz). No alternatives or exclusions are stated, but the lack of sibling tools reduces the need for explicit when-not guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Search current remote / work-from-home jobs by category, region, perk, or company.
Search a live index of millions of open jobs from employer career sites and 100+ ATS platforms.
Search 6.3M+ live jobs from companies' own career pages, plus resume tailoring & cover letters.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceSearch current remote / work-from-home jobs by category, region, perk, or company — with ready-to-apply links.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSearch live startup.jobs listings with filters for role, location, and employment type, plus get job details, company profiles, hiring trends, and salary benchmarks.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides job search functionality using Careerjet API with features for keyword and location-based searches, advanced filtering, and support for 50+ countries and languages.3

JobsPipe MCP Serverofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching live, normalized job postings from 30+ ATS feeds and job boards, with tools for job search, source listing, pricing plans, and Upwork jobs.
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between overlapping purposes. The single tool's purpose is unambiguous.
The sole tool follows the clear verb_noun pattern 'search_jobs', which is consistent. With a single tool, naming consistency is trivially satisfied.
One tool is on the low end of the range. For a server dedicated to job search, a single search function may be sufficient, but it feels thin compared to typical MCP servers that offer multiple related operations.
The search tool returns comprehensive job listings with all relevant details, covering the core need of a job search server. However, there are minor gaps such as no way to fetch a specific job by ID or apply, though these may be outside the server's stated scope.