Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Convert images to PNG, JPEG, WebP, or AVIF through one public remote MCP tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool available, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The purpose of convert_image is clear and unambiguous.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern and accurately describes its function. Consistency is inherent with only one tool.

Tool Count2/5

The server has only one tool, which is too few for a server named 'Pixel Agent' that suggests a broader image manipulation scope. This will limit agents to a single, narrow operation.

Completeness2/5

The tool covers only format conversion, omitting common image operations like resizing, cropping, or metadata inspection. This leaves significant gaps that will prevent agents from accomplishing many image-related tasks.

Available Tools

1 tool
convert_imageConvert imageA
Read-onlyIdempotent
Inspect

Convert one base64-encoded image to PNG, JPEG, WebP, or AVIF. Use the REST API for source images larger than 5 MB.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
formatYes
qualityNoOptional for JPEG, WebP, and AVIF.
filenameNoOptional original filename used to derive the result name.
image_base64YesBase64-encoded source image bytes. Maximum decoded size: 5 MB.
input_mime_typeYes

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
bytesYes
filenameYes
mime_typeYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly and idempotent behavior, and the description does not contradict them. The description adds the 5 MB limit, but that is also present in the schema. It does not disclose additional side effects or state-change behavior beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose and followed by a single actionable constraint. Every word earns its place with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema and annotations present, the description covers the essential behavior and the key size limitation. It could mention the return format explicitly, but the output schema likely fills that gap. The description is sufficient for a straightforward conversion tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 60%; the description reinforces that the source is base64 and lists target formats, complementing the schema. However, it does not fully compensate for undocumented parameters like input_mime_type, though enums provide some meaning. The description adds moderate value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool converts a base64-encoded image to one of four specific formats (PNG, JPEG, WebP, AVIF). It uses a specific verb and resource, making the purpose immediately clear even without sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells users to use the REST API for source images larger than 5 MB, providing a clear when-not-to-use condition. It could mention more contextual use cases, but the size threshold is a concrete and actionable guideline.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources