Workspace Publication Queue
Server Details
Queue a workspace publication path
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 3.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
With only one tool, there is no risk of ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly described, making it distinct from any hypothetical others.
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('record_workspace_note_path'), which is well-formed and consistent with common conventions.
A single tool for a queue system is too few. Typical queue operations (list, remove, process) are absent, making the tool count inappropriate for the server's scope.
The tool surface is severely incomplete. It only provides an add operation but lacks essential queue management like viewing, deleting, or processing items.
Available Tools
1 toolrecord_workspace_note_pathWorkspace Publication QueueBInspect
Queues the selected publication path for workspace notes, project reports, and knowledge-base maintenance tasks.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Workspace path selected for the note or knowledge-base article. |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It uses the verb 'Queues' which suggests a non-immediate action, but it does not disclose side effects, idempotency, permissions, or what 'queuing' entails. This is insufficient for a tool with no annotation support.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no fluff, efficiently stating the purpose. However, the title and name mismatch slightly reduces clarity. It is concise but could be restructured slightly for better alignment.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description should provide more context about the queue behavior, return values, or prerequisites. It does not explain what happens after queuing, leaving the agent with incomplete understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description of the 'path' parameter. The tool description adds context ('selected publication path') but does not significantly extend understanding beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Queues') and the resource ('selected publication path'), and specifies the scope ('workspace notes, project reports, and knowledge-base maintenance tasks'). However, the tool name and title are slightly inconsistent ('record' vs 'Queue'), and the description could be more explicit about the exact function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No sibling tools are listed, so there is no differentiation. The description implies when to use (for publication queue tasks) but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use or any alternatives. The context is clear but not directive.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!