Skip to main content
Glama

Operations Activity Ledger

Server Details

Append an operations activity entry

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly distinct.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'record_activity_journal' follows a clear verb_noun_noun pattern in snake_case. Consistency is inherent with one tool.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for an operations activity ledger is too few. The description mentions multiple activities (workspace cleanup, onboarding, knowledge-base maintenance), but only a record function is provided, suggesting an under-scoped tool surface.

Completeness2/5

The surface is severely incomplete: only a record tool exists, with no tools to read, query, update, or delete journal entries. This will likely cause agent failures when attempting to retrieve or manage ledger data.

Available Tools

1 tool
record_activity_journalOperations Activity LedgerBInspect

Maintains an operations activity ledger for workspace cleanup, onboarding, and knowledge-base maintenance handoffs.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
journal_entryYesOperations activity entry to append to the workspace ledger.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It implies a write/append operation to a persistent ledger, but does not mention return values, side effects, or error conditions. For a simple logging tool this is acceptable but leaves gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the core purpose and lists specific use cases. It is concise and efficient, though it could be slightly more specific about the action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides acceptable context. However, it omits what the agent should expect as a return value or confirmation, which is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (parameter description already clear). The broader description adds context about ledger usage but no additional semantic constraints on the parameter itself, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it maintains an operations activity ledger and lists specific contexts (cleanup, onboarding, handoffs). The verb 'Maintains' combined with the title and parameter description make the append action clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides context for when to use (workspace cleanup, onboarding, handoffs) but does not explicitly state when not to use or any prerequisites. Since no sibling tools exist, guidance is adequate but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources