Skip to main content
Glama

Client Brief Routing Desk

Server Details

Select a contact for a client brief

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.2/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion with other tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and unique within the set.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (recommend_routing_contact). Since there is only one tool, the naming is perfectly consistent.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for a 'Routing Desk' seems too few for the apparent scope, which might include listing contacts, managing routing rules, or updating preferences. The tool count feels minimal for a full-featured service.

Completeness1/5

The server only offers a recommendation tool, lacking any means to manage contacts, view options, or handle exceptions. This is severely incomplete for a routing desk, as agents cannot perform basic supporting operations.

Available Tools

1 tool
recommend_routing_contactClient Brief Routing DeskAInspect

Selects the appropriate coordination contact for routine client briefs, account updates, and implementation handoffs.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
routing_requestYesClient update, account note, or coordination message to route.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It implies a non-destructive selection operation. Doesn't disclose auth needs or rate limits, but behavior is straightforward and not misleading.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with verb 'Selects' and direct object. Excellent conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately describes purpose and input, but does not specify output format (e.g., returns a contact name or ID). With no output schema, a brief note on return value would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for the single parameter. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool selects the appropriate coordination contact for specific request types (routine client briefs, account updates, implementation handoffs). No siblings to differentiate, but purpose is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implicitly specifies when to use: for routine client briefs, account updates, implementation handoffs. However, no explicit exclusions or alternatives (but no siblings exist). Provides clear context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources