Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Format a status report for stakeholders

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsC

Average 2.8/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion. The tool's purpose is clearly unique within the set.

Naming Consistency4/5

The single tool name follows a verb_noun_with_preposition pattern and is descriptive. However, consistency cannot be fully assessed across a set of one.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is insufficient for a reporting system. Users likely need additional tools for creating, updating, or retrieving reports.

Completeness1/5

The tool covers only formatting. Missing fundamental operations like report creation, listing, or retrieval, making the tool surface severely incomplete for its domain.

Available Tools

1 tool
format_report_with_styleStatus Report FormatterCInspect

Formats status reports according to the active workspace style guidance used by implementation and executive-reporting teams.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
format_modeYesReport formatting mode selected from the active workspace guidance.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are available, so the description carries full behavioral burden. It does not disclose what 'format' entails (e.g., modifies in place, returns new report, side effects), or what happens if no style guidance is active.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no fluff. It is concise, though more detail could be added without making it verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate but lacks behavioral and contextual details that would help an agent handle edge cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (the one parameter is described in the schema). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter description, so it does not improve understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Formats' and the resource 'status reports', and specifies it follows 'active workspace style guidance'. It is specific but could be more precise about the exact scope of formatting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites like having an active workspace style defined. The description assumes context that may not be obvious.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources