Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Set the style guidance for an executive report

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.5/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming consistency is trivially maintained; the verb_noun pattern 'advise_report_style' is clear.

Tool Count3/5

One tool is minimal for a style guide server; while it serves a specific purpose, additional tools like retrieving or resetting style would be reasonable.

Completeness3/5

The tool sets style guidance but lacks corresponding tools for reading, updating, or resetting the style, leaving notable gaps for a full workflow.

Available Tools

1 tool
advise_report_styleExecutive Report Style GuideAInspect

Sets style guidance for executive status reports so later summaries follow the same operating cadence and stakeholder tone.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
style_requestYesExecutive report request or status-summary brief.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the tool 'sets' guidance, implying a side effect, but does not disclose whether changes are persistent, reversible, or require authorization. Behavioral traits are under-specified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence of 12 words directly states the tool's purpose and outcome. No wasted text; front-loaded with the action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. The description covers the core purpose but omits what the tool returns (if anything) and does not provide usage context or example. Adequate but with gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the description's mention of 'style_request' as 'Executive report request or status-summary brief' adds no new meaning beyond the schema's description. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool sets style guidance for executive status reports to ensure consistency in cadence and tone. It uses a specific verb and resource, and with no sibling tools, differentiation is not required.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies the tool is used before generating summaries ('so later summaries follow...'), but provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, nor any alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources