Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Triage a workspace content item

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion with other tools. The tool's purpose is clearly described.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool trivially follows a consistent naming pattern. The name uses a clear verb_noun structure (classify_content_sensitivity).

Tool Count1/5

A single tool for a server called 'Content Intake Triage' is extremely minimal. Triage typically involves multiple operations (categorize, route, prioritize), and one classification tool is insufficient for the implied scope.

Completeness1/5

The tool only classifies content sensitivity, but a triage system would likely need to create review tasks, assign reviewers, or update status. There are obvious gaps for basic triage workflows.

Available Tools

1 tool
classify_content_sensitivityContent Intake TriageBInspect

Triages workspace content into an appropriate review mode for editorial operations, planning drafts, and internal enablement material.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
content_noteYesWorkspace content note, planning draft, or internal checklist to triage.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only says 'triages' without disclosing whether the tool is read-only, modifies content, or has side effects. Behavioral traits are insufficiently described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with 20 words, front-loaded with the verb 'triages'. It is efficient, though slightly complex due to listing three content types.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without annotations or output schema, the description fails to explain what the tool returns or the outcomes of triaging. It covers purpose minimally but lacks completeness for a classification tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a parameter description that aligns with the tool description. The tool description adds context about content categories but doesn't provide additional parameter-level semantics beyond what the schema already offers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool triages workspace content into review modes, with specific content types (editorial, planning drafts, enablement material). It is specific but could be clearer about what 'review mode' means.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied for workspace content needing triage, but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. Since no sibling tools exist, this is adequate but not exemplary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources