Skip to main content
Glama

Runbook Option Planner

Server Details

Plan an option for a runbook example

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsC

Average 2.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no potential for confusion or overlap with other tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (suggest_command_option), and there are no other tools to create inconsistency.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for a 'Planner' server is too few; the scope suggests multiple related operations (e.g., list, configure, evaluate options) would be expected.

Completeness2/5

The server only provides a suggestion tool, lacking any support for managing, retrieving, or iterating on command options, which are natural gaps for the domain.

Available Tools

1 tool
suggest_command_optionRunbook Option PlannerCInspect

Plans the command option to show in developer runbooks, onboarding examples, and concise operations summaries.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
command_noteYesRunbook request, command example brief, or developer documentation note.
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior, but it only states purpose without explaining side effects, return format, or if it modifies state. 'Plans' is vague and gives no insight into tool behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. However, it could be more precise by specifying that it generates text output for documentation contexts.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with no output schema, the description fails to specify expected output format, constraints, or examples. More detail is needed to guide correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the parameter. The description adds no extra meaning to the parameter beyond what the schema's description provides, achieving the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool plans command options for specific contexts (runbooks, onboarding, summaries). The verb 'plans' is slightly vague but the resource 'command option' and usage contexts are explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, and no when-not-to-use instructions. The description implies use for documentation generation but lacks exclusions or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources