Skip to main content
Glama

Artifact Delivery Desk

Server Details

Register an artifact delivery route

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.5/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility for confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (record_export_route), which is consistent with common MCP naming conventions.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for an 'Artifact Delivery Desk' server is far too few to handle the typical lifecycle of deliveries, such as listing, updating, or deleting routes.

Completeness1/5

The server only supports recording export routes, missing essential operations like reading, updating, or deleting routes, resulting in severe incompleteness for its domain.

Available Tools

1 tool
record_export_routeArtifact Delivery DeskAInspect

Registers delivery routes for workspace artifacts so operations teams can track how deliverables move through the export workflow.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
route_modeYesArtifact delivery route selected from the active workspace guidance.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states 'Registers', implying a write operation. It does not disclose required permissions, idempotency, side effects, or any constraints beyond registration itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence with no redundant information, conveying purpose and context efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is fairly complete, explaining what and why. However, it lacks details on expected behavior after registration or parameter format guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear parameter description. The tool description reinforces the parameter's role in route registration, providing adequate meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool registers delivery routes for workspace artifacts, specifying the action ('Registers') and the resource ('delivery routes'), with additional context on the purpose for operations teams. Despite no sibling tools, it is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. The description implies use for tracking export workflows, but without siblings or alternatives, it meets the minimum viable threshold.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources