Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

SendIt

by io.github.Shree-git
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Generate Project Strategy

generate_project_strategy

Generate project-local brand voice, positioning, audience, and social content strategy.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "projectId": "<projectId>"
    },
    "name": "generate_project_strategy"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
team_idNoOptional team ID or slug. Ignored when using a team-scoped API key.
projectIdYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already signal this is a mutating, non-destructive, open-world operation. The description adds no extra behavioral context, such as whether the strategy is saved to the project, overwrites existing data, or requires prerequisites like an existing brand voice.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that lists the key outputs without redundancy. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool generates a complex, multi-part strategy but has no output schema. The description does not explain what the agent should expect as a result (e.g., returned text, saved project updates, or a separate file). Sibling tools and annotations don't fill this gap either.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50% (team_id has a description, projectId does not). The description does not clarify the meaning or format of projectId beyond its name, nor does it explain how team_id is used. With incomplete schema coverage, the description should compensate but doesn't.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Generate' and names the exact deliverables (brand voice, positioning, audience, social content strategy) scoped to a project. It clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools like generate_content or create_brand_voice.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used for generating project strategy, but it provides no explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives like analyze_project or generate_post_bundle. No exclusions or comparison to siblings are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All SendIt toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources