Phoenix operational_context unpaid canary
Server Details
Unpaid qualification-gated operational_context canary. Staging data. No wallet.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolget_operational_contextGet operational_contextCInspect
Whether that named member-lane business is currently in-scope for a subsequent bounded operational action, using only operator-authoritative non-PII identity, category, status, site, and timestamps.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| source | No | ||
| grant_token | Yes | HMAC-signed unpaid_invited_canary grant | |
| business_slug | Yes | Must match grant tenant | |
| invitee_identity | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must disclose side effects or read-only nature. It doesn't state whether this is a pure read, what authentication is required beyond the token, or what happens on failure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
It's a single concise sentence, but the phrasing is convoluted and not well-structured for an agent to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely under-specified. It doesn't mention return format, error behavior, or any operational constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema descriptions cover only half the parameters; the description adds no meaningful mapping to parameters. Terms like 'identity' and 'category' are not tied to the parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is a noun phrase rather than a clear verb+resource statement. It vaguely indicates a check of 'in-scope' status but uses unexplained jargon ('member-lane business', 'bounded operational action') without clarifying what the tool actually returns or does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use. It implies a pre-action check but provides no context about alternatives or situations to avoid.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
get_operational_context
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Bounded data, document, web-quality, and operations services purchased with USDC through x402.
UK public-procurement qualification for agents, paid via x402 USDC on Base.
Paid remote MCP for context-budget routing, schema cost estimates, usage audits, and readiness.
Bi-temporal memory-as-a-service and paid agent labor. Pay-per-call USDC via x402; signed receipts.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProduction-grade Model Context Protocol (MCP) server delivering paywalled Web3 micro-services powered by autonomous x402 payment challenges on Base Mainnet.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePay-per-call structured data for autonomous AI agents. x402-metered, MCP-native.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous agents to inspect and audit unfamiliar x402 endpoints before spending USDC, using bounded read-only probes to surface payment challenges, pricing, network, receiver, and operational signals without signing or spending funds.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePaid remote MCP server for agent data-access boundary reviews, permission scope evidence, sensitive data notes, and governance receipts.-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by virtue of being the sole tool.
The single tool name follows a consistent verb_noun pattern ('get_operational_context'), which is clear and predictable. There are no other tools to create inconsistency.
A single tool feels borderline for most server scopes. While the tool is not trivial, the count is at the low end of the acceptable range, making it somewhat thin but not necessarily an extreme mismatch.
The tool surface is severely incomplete, offering only a 'get' operation with no corresponding create, update, or delete functionality. For any realistic domain lifecycle, this is a significant gap that would force agents to rely on external capabilities.