Skip to main content
Glama

OrbiAds — Google Ad Manager

Server Details

Automate Google Ad Manager: campaigns, line items, creatives, inventory, reporting — 51 tools.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlap.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming inconsistencies are not applicable; the name is clear and descriptive.

Tool Count1/5

A single server_info tool is grossly insufficient for a server purporting to provide Google Ad Manager operations, which would require many tools.

Completeness1/5

The server lacks any actual Ad Manager functionality; the only tool provides metadata, leaving the entire domain uncovered.

Available Tools

1 tool
server_infoAInspect

Public health and catalogue summary for OrbiAds MCP. Google Ad Manager operations still require OAuth.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It implies read-only behavior by stating 'public health and catalogue summary', but does not explicitly confirm no side effects or clarify OAuth requirements for this tool itself, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loading the tool's purpose and adding a relevant contextual note. Every sentence provides value without redundancy or unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, the description is fairly complete. It explains the tool's output and provides context about OAuth. However, it could be more specific about what 'public health summary' entails, but it is sufficient for a simple info tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, and the schema coverage is 100% trivially. The description does not need to add parameter information, and the baseline for 0 parameters is 4. No additional meaning is required or provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool provides a 'public health and catalogue summary' for the OrbiAds MCP, which is a specific purpose. It is distinct from potential siblings, although no siblings are listed, so it does not demonstrate differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for obtaining server status or overview, and includes a note about OAuth for GAM operations, which provides implicit context. However, there is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources