Skip to main content
Glama
Ownership verified

Server Details

Solana token safety for AI agents — rug-pull, honeypot & Token-2022 trap detection before you buy.

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
MrWizardlyLoaf/rugcheck-ai
GitHub Stars
1
Server Listing
RugCheck AI

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 4.1/5 across 15 of 15 tools scored. Lowest: 2.4/5.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation3/5

Several tools overlap in purpose, particularly scan_token and verify_token_safety both offering a full safety verdict. Tools like is_safe, batch_scan, and compare_tokens also reuse aspects of the core scan, creating ambiguity about which to use for a given task.

Naming Consistency2/5

Tool names are inconsistent in style: some use verb_noun (scan_token, simulate_sell), others are noun phrases (holders_breakdown, rug_forecast) or mixed (verify_token_safety, execute_safe_swap). Underscores are used sporadically, and names like 'scammer_dna' lack clarity.

Tool Count4/5

With 15 tools focused on token safety analysis, the count is appropriate for covering various aspects without being overwhelming. The scope is well-defined, and each tool addresses a specific need, though some consolidation could reduce redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The server covers the full lifecycle of token safety analysis: scanning, specific checks (authorities, liquidity, holders), simulation, comparison, and forecasting. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for retrieving basic token metadata), but the core safety workflow is well-supported.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.