Skip to main content
Glama

Holidays MCP

Server Details

Free, keyless public holidays lookup for any country and year, plus single-date holiday checks.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.7/5 across 2 of 2 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one returns a full list of holidays for a country/year, the other checks a single date. There is no overlap in functionality, and each description explicitly notes when to prefer it.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: get_public_holidays and is_public_holiday. The verbs 'get' and 'is' appropriately reflect the different action types, while the resource 'public holiday(s)' is shared.

Tool Count4/5

At 2 tools, the server is minimal but well-scoped for its stated purpose of holiday queries. It is slightly on the thin side, yet both tools are essential and cover the core use cases without redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The server covers the two primary holiday operations: listing all holidays for a country/year and checking a specific date. A minor gap is the lack of a date-range query, but the existing tools handle the vast majority of typical requests.

Available Tools

2 tools
get_public_holidaysA
Read-only
Inspect

Full list of official public holidays for a country in a given year. Use for "what are the holidays in Germany in 2026", planning around a country's holiday calendar, or any "list the holidays for X" question. country_code is a 2-letter ISO code (US, GB, DE, FR, JP, ...) -- roughly 100 countries are covered, not every country worldwide. Returns each holiday's date, local name, English name, and type (e.g. Public, Bank, Observance).

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
yearYes
country_codeYes

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription

No output parameters

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint annotation, the description discloses the return format (date, local name, English name, type) and the scope of coverage (not every country). It does not mention error handling or edge cases, but for a read-only list tool, this is substantial additional context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and concise: it opens with the core purpose, then provides usage examples, parameter clarification, and return information. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema and the description covers the main behavioral aspects (return fields, country coverage). It could mention invalid input behavior, but given the simplicity of the tool (two parameters), the description is sufficiently complete for an agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates by explaining `country_code` is a 2-letter ISO code and lists examples (US, GB, DE, FR, JP). The `year` parameter is evident from the context 'in a given year,' and the return fields clarify expected output.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Full list of official public holidays for a country in a given year.' It uses a specific verb ('list') and resource ('public holidays'), and differentiates from the sibling tool `is_public_holiday` by emphasizing 'full list' versus single-date checking.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides concrete usage examples ('what are the holidays in Germany in 2026') and general use cases ('planning around a country's holiday calendar, or any list the holidays for X question'). It also notes a limitation (roughly 100 countries covered), which guides when the tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

is_public_holidayA
Read-only
Inspect

Checks whether one specific date is a public holiday in a country, and names it if so. Use for "is Dec 25 2026 a holiday in the US", "is the office closed on this date", or any single-date holiday check -- prefer this over get_public_holidays when the question is about just one day. country_code is a 2-letter ISO code; date is YYYY-MM-DD. Returns whether it's a holiday and, if so, its name.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateYes
country_codeYes

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription

No output parameters

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations include readOnlyHint=true, so the safe-read behavior is already declared. The description adds useful behavioral context: it names the holiday if applicable and explicitly states the return content ('Returns whether it's a holiday and, if so, its name'). This goes beyond annotations without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, then usage examples, parameter clarification, and return value. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter tool with an output schema and readOnlyHint annotation, the description covers purpose, usage, alternative, parameter formats, and return value. It is complete for an agent to select and invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only specifies parameter types ('string'), but the description adds meaning: 'country_code is a 2-letter ISO code; date is YYYY-MM-DD.' This fully compensates for the 0% schema description coverage, clarifying format and semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'Checks whether one specific date is a public holiday in a country, and names it if so,' which specifies the exact action and resource. It also distinguishes from the sibling tool by saying 'prefer this over get_public_holidays when the question is about just one day.'

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit use cases ('is Dec 25 2026 a holiday in the US', 'is the office closed on this date') and explicitly names the alternative tool (get_public_holidays) with guidance on when to use which. This is clear and actionable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides authoritative Philippine national holiday data sourced from official presidential proclamations, including regular, special, and Islamic holidays. It enables users to query specific dates, retrieve upcoming holidays, identify long weekends, and verify working day status.
    Last updated
    10
    MIT
  • F
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides access to the Nager.Date Public Holiday API for querying global holiday information through the Model Context Protocol. It enables AI agents to interact with standardized tools for holiday-related date calculations and country-specific lookups.
    Last updated

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources