Trendswap AI
Server Details
AI face swap and viral meme video generation MCP server.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 97.5% over 20 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
- URL
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only a single tool in the set, there is no possibility of overlap or misselection between tools. The lone tool's purpose is unambiguous.
list_templates follows a clear verb_noun snake_case convention. With one tool there is no inconsistency to introduce, though the convention cannot be verified against siblings.
A single tool is very thin for a server that appears to be a template/video platform. Even a read-only browsing surface would typically include fetching a template by ID or searching/filtering, so one tool under-serves the apparent scope.
Only a list operation exists; there is no get_template, search/filter, or any way to retrieve details, preview, or use a specific template. Agents hitting a listed template ID have no follow-up operation, creating a dead end.
Available Tools
1 toollist_templatesARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
List all available viral video templates on Trendswap with their template IDs, descriptions, and preview URLs. Supports 4 global languages. No authentication required.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely non-redundant context beyond that: no authentication is required and four global languages are supported. It does not mention rate limits or pagination, keeping it short of a 5.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three tight sentences with zero filler. The core action and returned data are front-loaded, and the language/auth details follow as supporting facts.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless, read-only list tool with no output schema, the description compensates by naming the fields returned and stating the language and auth situation. Nothing an agent needs in order to call it correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; the baseline for a parameterless tool is 4. The description correctly avoids inventing filtering options that the empty schema does not support.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('List all available viral video templates on Trendswap') and enumerates the returned fields (template IDs, descriptions, preview URLs). No sibling tools exist, so no differentiation is required; the scope is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is only implied — an agent can infer this is the discovery call for templates — and there are no alternatives to weigh. The 'No authentication required' clause does help an agent decide it can call this immediately, but no explicit when/when-not guidance is given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
- Removed
create_generation_job - Removed
get_credits_balance - Removed
get_job_status
4 tool updates
- First observed
create_generation_job - First observed
get_credits_balance - First observed
get_job_status - First observed
list_templates
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Wan AI video generation
MCP server for OpenAI Sora AI video generation
MCP server for Luma Dream Machine AI video generation
MCP server for Hailuo (MiniMax) AI video generation
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI-powered media generation: images, videos, audio, and upscaling using 99 AI models.6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to generate AI videos and images, analyze video content, and download videos from Douyin and Xiaohongshu.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to automatically generate vertical 'brainrot' style videos with text-to-speech voiceovers, synchronized subtitles, and custom SVG overlays.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for faceless YouTube video automation, turning LLM-authored scripts into narrated, captioned videos with AI-generated images and motion.9MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.