Skip to main content
Glama

Complete Brand Colour Intelligence Report

brand_report
Read-only

One-call complete brand colour intelligence report. Input: hex + brand context + markets + medium + product type. Output: archive anchor, cliche contradiction, colour DNA, strategy verdict, commercial signals, market reading per market, usage rules, palette roles, ecommerce copy, memory hooks, Instagram caption, and Midjourney/Flux/DALLE agent brief. Use this instead of chaining colour_strategy + cliche_breaker + ecommerce_product_copy + memory_hooks + agent_brief separately. Two Claude calls total. One complete response.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hexYesHero hex colour e.g. '#4A2A50'
mediumNoMedium e.g. 'packaging', 'digital', 'interior'general
conceptNoOptional concept to search for cliche contradiction e.g. 'luxury', 'eco', 'wellness'
marketsNoTarget markets e.g. ['UK', 'France', 'Japan']
product_typeNoProduct type for copy e.g. 'velvet cushion', 'fragrance', 'cleaning spray'
target_modelNoImage model for agent brief e.g. 'midjourney', 'flux', 'dalle'midjourney
brand_contextNoBrand context: category, positioning, audience, channels

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Structured JSON response. Shape varies by tool; most return an 'ok' boolean plus a 'result' or 'results' field with the tool's data payload.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "properties": {
      -    "error": {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "ok": {
      -      "type": "boolean"
      -    },
      -    "result": {
      -      "type": [
      -        "object",
      -        "array",
      -        "string",
      -        "null"
      -      ]
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "error": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "result": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "array",
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With readOnlyHint annotation already conveying safety, the description adds useful behavioral context: it explains the tool is a composite that aggregates outputs from multiple sub-tools and mentions the internal 'Two Claude calls' detail. It also lists the full set of outputs, giving transparency into what the report includes. No contradiction with annotations is present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with clear 'Input:' and 'Output:' sections and a final usage sentence. It is front-loaded with the main concept, and while the output list is long, each item is relevant and earns its place. It is not verbose or repetitive, and it avoids unnecessary fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (7 parameters, output schema, nested objects), the description covers inputs, outputs, and usage guidance, making it reasonably complete. The existence of an output schema means it does not need to detail return structures. It could optionally mention more about prerequisites or limitations, but overall it provides sufficient context for an agent to decide and invoke.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage, with each parameter described in detail. The description itself lists the inputs ('hex + brand context + markets + medium + product type') but adds little semantic value beyond grouping them. It does not provide additional format, constraints, or relationships to outputs that aren't already in the schema. Thus, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a 'complete brand colour intelligence report' with a specific verb ('report') and resource ('brand colour intelligence'). It explicitly differentiates from sibling tools by naming them: 'colour_strategy + cliche_breaker + ecommerce_product_copy + memory_hooks + agent_brief', and positions itself as the composite alternative. This is a strong, specific purpose statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit usage guidance: 'Use this instead of chaining ... separately' and mentions 'Two Claude calls total. One complete response.' This tells the agent when to choose this tool over chaining individual tools. However, it does not explicitly state when NOT to use it (e.g., when only one specific output is needed), so it falls short of a perfect 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources