Skip to main content
Glama

website-to-json

Server Details

Turn any webpage into structured JSON with CSS-selector schemas - strings select text, attributes

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
URL
Repository
DataLeadsPRO/website-to-json
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
website-to-json

TDQS

C2.6/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clear from its name, making it unambiguous.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'website_to_json' follows a clear descriptive pattern, and there is no inconsistency since it is the only tool.

Tool Count3/5

Having only one tool feels very thin for a server, but it may be appropriate if the sole purpose is converting websites to JSON. However, the scope is unclear from the minimal description, making it borderline.

Completeness3/5

The server only offers one operation, lacking additional functionality like batch processing, configuration options, or error handling. For a simple conversion task it might be sufficient, but the vague description makes it hard to assess full coverage.

Available Tools

1 tool
website_to_jsonCInspect

V1 Website To Json

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNo
schemaNo
maxTimeoutNo

TDQS

C2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It does not mention any side effects, network requests, or dependencies on external URLs. The description is too minimal to provide transparency about operational characteristics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (five words), which could be seen as concise, but it is under-specified rather than efficient. It does not provide enough information, so the brevity is not effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and three undocumented parameters, the description is grossly inadequate. It provides no information about expected inputs, behavior, or outputs. An agent has almost no basis to correctly invoke this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any parameters. The schema itself has generic types but no descriptions for 'url', 'schema', or 'maxTimeout'. The description fails to provide any semantic meaning beyond what the schema field names suggest.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title suggests converting a website to JSON, but the description is just 'V1 Website To Json', which is essentially a version label and tautology. It does not clearly state what the tool does, such as scraping or extracting structured data from a website. However, 'Website To Json' gives a basic idea of the purpose, so it is not entirely missing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool or how it differs from alternatives. No sibling tools are provided, and the description offers no context about intended use cases or limitations. This is a clear gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedwebsite_to_json

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables extracting precise data from web pages by parsing the DOM with CSS selectors and returning structured JSON, while also offering tools to inspect page structure, discover candidate selectors, and verify them without loading full pages into context.
    5
    -
  • -
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Extract structured data from any website with a simple SDK call. No scraping code, no headless browsers - just prompt and get JSON.
    62
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to extract structured JSON data from web pages using presets or custom JSON schemas, with confidence scores and source snippets, paid per call via USDC on Base.
    -
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.