Skip to main content
Glama

real-estate-listings

Server Details

Pull property listings, prices, and details from real-estate sites as structured JSON.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
URL
Repository
DataLeadsPRO/real-estate-listings
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
real-estate-listings

TDQS

D1.6/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool in the set, there is no possibility of confusing it with other tools. The tool is uniquely identifiable by default.

Naming Consistency3/5

A single tool cannot demonstrate a naming pattern, but the name 'realestate' is at least internally consistent. However, it is vague and not descriptive of an action or resource.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for a real-estate listings domain is far too few to provide meaningful functionality. The server feels extremely thin and under-scoped for its stated purpose.

Completeness1/5

The surface is severely incomplete: there are no operations to list, create, update, delete, or search real-estate listings. The one vague tool offers no discernible coverage of the domain.

Available Tools

1 tool
realestateDInspect

V1 Realestate

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNo
maxTimeoutNo

TDQS

D1.1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior, side effects, requirements, or constraints. 'V1 Realestate' discloses none of these, leaving the tool's behavioral profile completely opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, but this is under-specification rather than efficient conciseness. It contains no information an agent can act on, so brevity does not serve the tool's usability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, no annotations, and no parameter descriptions, yet the description provides no compensating context. An agent lacks even a minimal understanding of what the tool returns, what it operates on, or what successful invocation looks like.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the two parameters, url and maxTimeout. The schema itself provides only names and types, so neither the schema nor the description gives an agent enough context to fill in these parameters correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'V1 Realestate' is essentially a tautology of the tool name. It does not state a verb, an action, a resource, or any differentiating functionality, so an agent cannot determine what this tool actually does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool, what problem it solves, or how it relates to any alternatives. With no sibling tools and no contextual hints, an agent has no basis for selecting it over other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedrealestate

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.