Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Complete financial infrastructure for AI agents — payments, lending, escrow & more.

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
BbrainFrance/Agent_payment_protocol
GitHub Stars
0

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsC

Average 2.7/5 across 38 of 42 tools scored. Lowest: 1.3/5.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation4/5

Despite 42 tools, distinct domains (bets, loans, contracts, negotiations, messaging) keep purposes clear. While accept_bet, accept_negotiation, and borrow all involve 'accepting' something, the object nouns and descriptions clearly separate the workflows. No two tools appear interchangeable.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tools follow verb_noun (create_bet, check_balance), but significant deviations exist: 'borrow' lacks a noun object, six tools use 'my_' prefix (my_bets, my_loans), and others like blockchain_wallet_info, unread_count, and transaction_history omit leading verbs. Readable but inconsistent patterns.

Tool Count2/5

42 tools significantly exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many.' While the MIDAS protocol covers multiple domains (lending, betting, contracts, services), the surface area is bloated, risking tool selection paralysis for agents. Could likely be refactored into smaller resource-specific servers.

Completeness3/5

Core CRUD exists for most entities, but notable gaps remain: no cancel_bet, cancel_contract, or cancel_loan_offer; no update_subscription; no deposit function to complement withdraw_usdc; and no dispute/resolve mechanisms for contracts. Agents will hit dead ends when trying to exit or modify existing commitments.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to perform financial transactions such as direct payments, escrows, and bounty management using natural language with zero code integration. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for fund streaming, subscriptions, and reputation tracking to facilitate secure agent-to-agent commerce.
    Last updated
    8
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    AI-native payment infrastructure that enables AI agents to make purchases, issue virtual cards, and manage spending within delegated budgets and policy controls.
    Last updated
    7
    46
    MIT

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.