uk-pest-management

Tools are generally well-differentiated by function. Minor overlap exists between `get_treatments` and `get_ipm_guidance` (both address control methods), and the three metadata tools (`about`, `check_data_freshness`, `list_sources`) serve related but distinct purposes. The distinction between `search_pests` (name-based) and `identify_from_symptoms` (diagnostic) is clear.

Strong adherence to verb_noun convention throughout (`get_pest_details`, `search_crop_threats`, `list_sources`). The outlier `about` breaks the pattern (should be `get_server_info` or similar). `identify_from_symptoms` uses a preposition but remains readable and consistent in style.

Ten tools is ideal for this domain: 3 for data provenance/metadata, 3 for pest discovery/search, and 4 for detailed guidance and treatments. The scope is well-focused on UK agricultural pest reference data without bloat or trivial fragmentation.

Excellent coverage of the reference data lifecycle: pest identification (symptom-based and search), crop threat assessment, detailed profiles, treatment options (chemical/biological/cultural), approved products lookup, and IPM strategy guidance. Minor gap: no retrieval of specific product details by ID, only search.