Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Free, no-signup e-signature platform. On a paid account, ask your AI assistant about document status or search your own documents in plain English — check_status (who's signed/pending) and find_documents (search by title, signer, email, or company), both read-only."

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly singular.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (check_status), and with only one tool, consistency is trivially maintained.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for a service named Docracy is very thin. A signing service would typically require additional tools such as create, send, or cancel.

Completeness1/5

The server only supports checking the status of a signing chain, lacking essential operations like creating, managing, or canceling signing chains. This is severely incomplete for the domain.

Available Tools

1 tool
check_statusCheck signing statusAInspect

Look up the status of a Docracy signing chain from a sign or status link — who's signed, who's still pending.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
linkYesThe docracy.io sign or status link (or just the token) you were emailed.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It implies read-only behavior via 'look up' and discloses the return content (signer status), which is meaningful behavioral context. It does not mention error handling or authentication, but this is acceptable for a simple status lookup.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The entire description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. It earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. The description covers input, purpose, and output sufficiently for an agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter description in the schema already fully covers the 'link' parameter (100% coverage), so the description adds minimal new parameter semantics. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Look up') and identifies the resource ('status of a Docracy signing chain') plus the expected output ('who's signed, who's still pending'). This clearly differentiates the tool's purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description specifies the required input type ('from a sign or status link'), making it clear when this tool is relevant. Since no sibling tools exist, exclusions are unnecessary, but explicit 'use this when' phrasing is absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    GTM signal intelligence suite for AI agents. Six tools: hiring signals, tech stack detection, company-to-LinkedIn resolution, ICP scoring, job board scanning, and a combined signals aggregator. Built for outbound sales workflows.
    11
    737
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Browse IndustryLens's published competitive-intelligence reports and head-to-head competitor comparisons from any AI agent — real, source-backed data.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A Voice of Customer pipeline that cross-references feedback from calls, reviews, chat, and other sources to surface only corroborated patterns, routing actionable insights with exact customer quotes to the right people.
    MIT

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources