Docracy
Server Details
Free, no-signup e-signature platform. On a paid account, ask your AI assistant about document status or search your own documents in plain English — check_status (who's signed/pending) and find_documents (search by title, signer, email, or company), both read-only."
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 4.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly singular.
The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (check_status), and with only one tool, consistency is trivially maintained.
A single tool for a service named Docracy is very thin. A signing service would typically require additional tools such as create, send, or cancel.
The server only supports checking the status of a signing chain, lacking essential operations like creating, managing, or canceling signing chains. This is severely incomplete for the domain.
Available Tools
1 toolcheck_statusCheck signing statusAInspect
Look up the status of a Docracy signing chain from a sign or status link — who's signed, who's still pending.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| link | Yes | The docracy.io sign or status link (or just the token) you were emailed. |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It implies read-only behavior via 'look up' and discloses the return content (signer status), which is meaningful behavioral context. It does not mention error handling or authentication, but this is acceptable for a simple status lookup.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The entire description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. It earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. The description covers input, purpose, and output sufficiently for an agent to invoke it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The parameter description in the schema already fully covers the 'link' parameter (100% coverage), so the description adds minimal new parameter semantics. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Look up') and identifies the resource ('status of a Docracy signing chain') plus the expected output ('who's signed, who's still pending'). This clearly differentiates the tool's purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description specifies the required input type ('from a sign or status link'), making it clear when this tool is relevant. Since no sibling tools exist, exclusions are unnecessary, but explicit 'use this when' phrasing is absent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGTM signal intelligence suite for AI agents. Six tools: hiring signals, tech stack detection, company-to-LinkedIn resolution, ICP scoring, job board scanning, and a combined signals aggregator. Built for outbound sales workflows.117371MIT

industrylens-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceBrowse IndustryLens's published competitive-intelligence reports and head-to-head competitor comparisons from any AI agent — real, source-backed data.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Voice of Customer pipeline that cross-references feedback from calls, reviews, chat, and other sources to surface only corroborated patterns, routing actionable insights with exact customer quotes to the right people.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDetects hiring intent signals by scanning job boards for specific companies. Returns structured role data for outbound sales targeting.1761MIT