council-consult

Each tool has a clearly distinct role: listing lenses, comparing two lenses, stress-testing a decision, extracting assumptions, and generating receipts. The detailed descriptions clarify boundaries, and even overlapping features like assumption extraction in both assumption_map and stress_test_decision serve different contexts.

All tool names use snake_case and are readable, but the verb_noun pattern is not uniform: list_lenses and compare_lenses follow it, while assumption_map and council_receipt are noun_noun. This minor deviation prevents a perfect score but does not cause confusion.

With exactly 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose. Each tool earns its place and covers a distinct step in the consultation workflow without redundant or unnecessary additions.

The set covers the core workflow: discovering lenses, comparing them, stress-testing decisions, extracting assumptions, and creating shareable receipts. However, stress_test_decision does not allow manually selecting which lenses to consult, which is a notable gap for users wanting to test against specific thinkers beyond the two-lens compare tool.