Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Apollo->Salesforce Lead mapper. No LLM. Strict-fail required fields. PASS/REPAIR/FAIL verdict.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.

Tool Definition Quality

Score is being calculated. Check back soon.

Available Tools

1 tool
apollo_to_salesforce_leadApollo → Salesforce Lead MapperAInspect

Maps an Apollo contact payload to a Salesforce Lead object. Accepts the full Apollo CSV export column set. Strict-fail if FirstName, LastName, or Phone cannot be resolved. All other Salesforce fields are populated when source data is present, silently omitted otherwise. Returns a Deterministic Receipt (task_id, verdict, confidence, diff[]) embedded in every non-FAIL response.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
zipNoAlternate ZIP key → PostalCode.
cellNoPrimary phone (legacy key). Accepts E.164, 10-digit US, formatted strings.
cityNoCity → City.
emailNoContact email → Email.
phoneNoApollo 'Phone' column — alternate primary phone key.
stateNoState / province → State.
titleNoJob title → Title.
sourceNoApollo 'Source' column → LeadSource.
streetNoStreet address → Street.
companyNoCompany name → Company.
countryNoCountry → Country.
websiteNoCompany website → Website.
headlineNoLinkedIn headline captured by Apollo → Description.
industryNoIndustry → Industry.
keywordsNoApollo keywords/tags → Description.
linkedinNoAlternate LinkedIn key → LinkedIn__c.
employeesNoAlternate employees key.
full_nameNoFull name — must have ≥2 whitespace-separated tokens. Use this OR provide first_name + last_name. Example: 'Jane Doe'
job_titleNoApollo 'Job Title' column → Title.
last_nameNoLast name (Apollo split export). Use with first_name instead of full_name.
prop_addrNoFull property address string (legacy v1 key) → PropertyAddress.
seniorityNoApollo seniority level → Description.
first_nameNoFirst name (Apollo split export). Use with last_name instead of full_name.
work_phoneNoApollo 'Work Phone' column — lowest-priority fallback.
departmentsNoApollo departments string → Description.
lead_sourceNoLead source string → LeadSource (mapped to Salesforce picklist values).
person_cityNoApollo 'Person City' column → City.
postal_codeNoZIP / postal code → PostalCode.
twitter_urlNoTwitter/X URL → Twitter__c.
account_nameNoApollo 'Account Name' column → Company.
linkedin_urlNoLinkedIn profile URL → LinkedIn__c.
mobile_phoneNoApollo 'Mobile Phone' column. Maps to MobilePhone if a primary phone exists.
organizationNoApollo 'Organization' column → Company.
person_stateNoApollo 'Person State' column → State.
num_employeesNoAlternate employees key.
annual_revenueNoAnnual revenue string, e.g. '$1.2M', '500000' → AnnualRevenue (number).
person_countryNoApollo 'Person Country' → Country.
company_websiteNoApollo 'Company Website' → Website.
person_postal_codeNoApollo 'Person Postal Code' → PostalCode.
number_of_employeesNoEmployee count or range (e.g. '500-1000') → NumberOfEmployees.
estimated_annual_revenueNoApollo estimated revenue → AnnualRevenue.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses critical behaviors: strict-fail validation, silent omission of optional fields, and return structure (Deterministic Receipt with task_id, verdict, confidence, diff[]). Minor gap: ambiguous whether this writes to Salesforce or purely returns mapped payload.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences with zero waste: 1) purpose, 2) input scope, 3) validation behavior, 4) return format. Dense but scannable, front-loaded with the core mapping function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Excellent for 41-param transformation tool without output schema. Explains mapping coverage (full Apollo CSV set), validation strictness, failure modes, and return receipt structure. Would be 5 if it clarified sync vs. async behavior or side-effects on Salesforce.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% description coverage (baseline 3). Description adds crucial semantic context: 'Accepts the full Apollo CSV export column set' explains param origin, and 'Strict-fail if FirstName, LastName, or Phone cannot be resolved' clarifies effective required fields that schema doesn't enforce (schema shows 0 required).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Excellent specificity: 'Maps an Apollo contact payload to a Salesforce Lead object' provides exact verb (Maps), source system (Apollo), and target (Salesforce Lead). The title reinforces this transformation purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clear validation rules stated: 'Strict-fail if FirstName, LastName, or Phone cannot be resolved' and 'silently omitted otherwise' explains error vs. success behaviors. Lacks explicit 'use when' workflow guidance, but validation logic effectively constrains usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources