harvis.dev
Server Details
Deploy static sites from AI agents: deploy_site publishes files and returns a live URL in seconds.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 tooldeploy_siteAInspect
Publish a static website to harvis.dev and get a live public URL back instantly. No account or authentication is needed. Pass every file of the site (HTML, CSS, JS, images...) with its path relative to the site root; include an index.html. Returns the live site 'url' plus a private 'claimUrl' — always show the user BOTH links and tell them to open claimUrl and sign in (free) to attach the site to their account so they can edit or delete it later. Warn them claimUrl is private and cannot be recovered if lost. The result also includes a private deployToken: pass it back on a later call to UPDATE that site in place (works before and after claiming) instead of creating a new one. The token identifies the site by itself; passing the subdomain too is optional and guards against updating the wrong site.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | Optional human-friendly site name. | |
| files | Yes | Every file of the site. Total size limit: 50 MB. | |
| subdomain | No | To UPDATE an existing site instead of creating a new one: the site's subdomain from an earlier deploy. Requires deployToken. | |
| deployToken | No | The site's private deploy token returned by the deploy that created it (also shown in the dashboard). Requires subdomain. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses authentication requirements, return values (url, claimUrl, deployToken), privacy warnings, and update semantics. However, the claim that subdomain is optional conflicts with the schema's requirement, creating a minor transparency gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is longer than ideal but well-structured, front-loading the primary action. Each sentence has a purpose, though some repetition with schema parameter descriptions could be trimmed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description covers all return values and usage flows, including update behavior and user instructions. It lacks error case details and contains the subdomain contradiction, but overall is quite complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already provides 100% coverage. The description adds guidance about file paths and index.html, but it contradicts the schema by saying subdomain is optional when schema says deployToken requires subdomain. This inconsistency could mislead an agent.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool publishes a static website to harvis.dev and returns a live public URL. It uses a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes the initial deploy from the update use case.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly explains when to publish (no account needed) and when to update (pass deployToken on a later call). It also instructs to include index.html and pass all files, providing concrete usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Instant web publishing for AI agents. POST HTML, get a live URL. No account needed.
Deploy files, sites, and Dockerfile apps to live URLs + private drives for agent memory.
Hosting for AI agents: publish a live website in one tool call, ephemeral or forever.
Host AI-generated HTML/CSS/JS instantly. Files, zips, or clone an existing page. Live in seconds.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to deploy static files and get live HTTPS URLs instantly, with support for custom domains and data residency.9142MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceInstant web hosting for AI agents. Publish a live site in one call, no account needed.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePublish the website you built with AI to a live public URL — straight from chat, no setup. Enables deploying static sites and updating them with edit tokens.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOne-call static page/site deploys for AI agents — POST HTML, a files map, or a zip and get back a live unguessable URL. Remote endpoint at https://ship.page/mcp, free tier needs no account or API key.MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of selecting the wrong tool. The tool's purpose is clearly described and distinct by default.
The single tool name 'deploy_site' follows a clear verb_noun convention, which is consistent even with just one tool.
The server has one substantial tool that handles deployment and update, but a single tool feels thin for a deployment service, placing it at the borderline of appropriate scope.
The tool covers deploy and update but lacks separate operations for listing, deleting, or otherwise managing sites. The claim workflow depends on manual external steps, leaving significant lifecycle gaps for automated agents.