Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Free dual MCP+agent registry. Probe Live, free demo, Kernel/Loop. Self-list + dual strategy.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
manhatton31-svg/dualregistry
GitHub Stars
0

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Agent network intelligence for trust verification, broker discovery, and capability matching. Ed25519 identity, graph-based trust scoring, USDC payments, and MCP tools for agent registration, search, and trust attestation.
    1,498
    5
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    The first MCP server that pays for itself. AI agents pay for ScriptMasterLabs data autonomously via x402 — 43+ pay-per-call tools for market intelligence, SEC filings, federal grants/contracts, and more.
    1
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.3/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Many tools have overlapping purposes, especially around discovery (search_active, ard_search, match_capability, mesh_match, network_sense, sense_traces, follow_trail) and liveness (check_liveness, check_status, probe_clean). The descriptions are dense but don't clearly differentiate when to use one vs another, making misselection likely.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tool names use snake_case, but there is no consistent verb_noun pattern. Some are bare verbs (attest, endorse, follow_trail), some use get_ prefixes, and some are noun phrases (abundance_rank, attractor_targets). While not chaotic, the naming style is inconsistent enough to reduce predictability.

Tool Count2/5

51 tools is excessive for a registry domain. Many seem to describe variations of the same concepts (e.g., multiple matching/search tools, multiple feedback paths). The count is well above the typical high end and suggests poor scoping.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface covers listing, searching, feedback, composition, and attestation, but lacks basic lifecycle operations like updating or deleting a listing. There are also many 'meta' tools (cost, acceleration, incentives) that don't map to a clear user need, leaving some core workflows incomplete.