Dual Registry
Server Details
Free dual MCP+agent registry. Probe Live, free demo, Kernel/Loop. Self-list + dual strategy.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- manhatton31-svg/dualregistry
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Agent-native CRM + get-booked platform. Operate over MCP, or pay per call via x402. No login.
AI agent registry — search, discover, register, and connect agents via MCP.
Hosted MCP with 91 agent tools: X, domains, SEO, Maps, Trends, Search, YouTube, TikTok, and more.
Remote MCP for compliant pay-per-use agent capabilities with x402 execution.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceFree x402 endpoint checker plus paid report and metadata tools. Remote MCP server for agents. Written by AI named Nock, not a human.

AIノアカリ☆ MCPofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRemote MCP server providing free tools for value-bearing responses and trust receipts, plus optional consent-based commerce, enabling agents and humans to connect to a coordinated AI operator.- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAgent network intelligence for trust verification, broker discovery, and capability matching. Ed25519 identity, graph-based trust scoring, USDC payments, and MCP tools for agent registration, search, and trust attestation.1,4985MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Many tools have overlapping purposes, especially around discovery (search_active, ard_search, match_capability, mesh_match, network_sense, sense_traces, follow_trail) and liveness (check_liveness, check_status, probe_clean). The descriptions are dense but don't clearly differentiate when to use one vs another, making misselection likely.
Most tool names use snake_case, but there is no consistent verb_noun pattern. Some are bare verbs (attest, endorse, follow_trail), some use get_ prefixes, and some are noun phrases (abundance_rank, attractor_targets). While not chaotic, the naming style is inconsistent enough to reduce predictability.
51 tools is excessive for a registry domain. Many seem to describe variations of the same concepts (e.g., multiple matching/search tools, multiple feedback paths). The count is well above the typical high end and suggests poor scoping.
The tool surface covers listing, searching, feedback, composition, and attestation, but lacks basic lifecycle operations like updating or deleting a listing. There are also many 'meta' tools (cost, acceleration, incentives) that don't map to a clear user need, leaving some core workflows incomplete.