Skip to main content
Glama

Detecto

Ownership verified

Server Details

Detect ecommerce platforms (Shopify, WooCommerce, Magento, PrestaShop, Wix, BigCommerce, OpenCart, Squarespace) for any online store via API

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsC

Average 2.9/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare against. The tool name 'detect_platform' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.

Tool Count2/5

One tool is too few for a server named 'Detecto' that appears focused on ecommerce platform detection, as it suggests a limited scope that may not support complex workflows or additional related functionalities.

Completeness2/5

The tool surface is severely incomplete for the inferred domain of ecommerce platform detection. It only offers detection without any supporting operations like validation, listing platforms, or handling errors, which are typical in such domains.

Available Tools

1 tool
detect_platformCInspect

Detects the ecommerce platform of any online store.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesDomain or URL of the store
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It describes the core function but lacks details on behavioral traits such as error handling, rate limits, authentication needs, or what happens with invalid inputs. The description is minimal and does not compensate for the absence of annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without any unnecessary words. It is appropriately sized and front-loaded, making it easy to understand quickly. Every part of the sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It covers the basic purpose but lacks information on behavioral aspects, error handling, and return values. For a tool with no structured data support, the description should provide more context to be fully helpful to an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with the 'url' parameter documented as 'Domain or URL of the store.' The description does not add any additional meaning beyond this schema information. With high schema coverage, the baseline score is 3, as the description does not enhance parameter understanding but also does not detract from it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Detects the ecommerce platform of any online store.' It uses a specific verb ('detects') and identifies the resource ('ecommerce platform'), but since there are no sibling tools, it cannot demonstrate differentiation from alternatives. The purpose is unambiguous and not tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It states what the tool does but offers no context about prerequisites, limitations, or scenarios where it is appropriate. Without sibling tools, there is no explicit comparison, but general usage context is still missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources