wopool.de Preisvergleich
Server Details
Deutscher Preisvergleich für Pools – Bestpreis-Suche (read-only).
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 4.2/5 across 2 of 2 tools scored.
Both tools deal with product lookup and return similar information (best price, 30-day trend, links). An agent may find it unclear whether to use 'search_offers' for a specific ID or 'lookup_product' for a broad search, as the descriptions indicate overlap.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'lookup_product' and 'search_offers'. The naming is clear and predictable.
With only 2 tools, the server is minimal. While it covers search and specific lookup, a price comparison service typically benefits from additional tools (e.g., category browsing, product comparison). The count feels slightly thin.
The tools cover the core use cases of searching for the cheapest price and looking up a specific product with price trends. Minor gaps exist, such as a lack of tools for browsing categories or viewing full price history beyond 30 days, but the surface is largely complete for a focused service.
Available Tools
2 toolslookup_productProdukt auf wopool.de per ID/URL nachschlagenARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Schlaegt ein konkretes Produkt im aktuellen wopool.de-Katalog per Produkt-ID (Amazon-ASIN bzw. externalId aus search_offers) ODER per Amazon-Produkt-URL nach. Liefert Bestpreis, 30-Tage-Preisstatistik und den Angebots-Link. Genau eines der Felder id/url angeben. Looks up a specific product in the wopool.de catalog by ID (ASIN/externalId) or Amazon product URL (read-only).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | No | Produkt-ID: Amazon-ASIN oder externalId. | |
| url | No | Amazon-Produkt-URL (z.B. https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0ABC123DE) — die ASIN wird extrahiert. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| site | No | |
| count | Yes | |
| query | No | |
| facets | No | Verfuegbare Filter-Werte (Marke + domain-spezifische Attribute) mit Trefferzahlen — zum gezielten Nachfiltern via query/brand/minPrice/maxPrice. |
| products | Yes | |
| updatedAt | No | |
| disclosure | No | |
| catalogVersion | No |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. The description adds that it returns best price, 30-day statistics, and offer link, which is beyond annotations. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description contains both German and English versions of essentially the same information, leading to redundancy. It could be more concise by using one language.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the low complexity (2 optional params, read-only) and presence of output schema, the description sufficiently covers what the tool does and returns. It is complete enough for an agent to use correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions. The description adds the constraint 'exactly one of the fields' and clarifies the types of IDs (ASIN/externalId), adding value over schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'looks up' and the specific resource 'product in the wopool.de catalog', and distinguishes it from the sibling 'search_offers' by specifying it is for a concrete product.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly requires exactly one of 'id' or 'url', and the context of 'concrete product' implies when to use vs. the sibling for multiple offers. No explicit when-not-to-use mention, but adequate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_offerspool in Deutschland zum Bestpreis finden (Amazon, eBay, AliExpress)ARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Findet pool zum guenstigsten aktuellen Preis in Deutschland (EUR) ueber Amazon, eBay und AliExpress — Preisvergleich wopool.de. Nutze dieses Tool, wenn ein Nutzer nach Preis, Angebot, "guenstig", "wo kaufen" oder einem konkreten pool fragt. Durchsucht ~150 Produkte, filterbar per Suchbegriff, Marke und Preisspanne. Liefert je Produkt: Titel, Bestpreis, Marke, Bild, 30-Tage-Preistrend (priceStats.isLowest30d = aktuell guenstigster Stand), domain-spezifische Attribute (attributes, z.B. Leistung/Speicher/Farbe), einen direkten Kauf-Link (url) und eine zitierfaehige Produktseite (detailUrl). Die Antwort enthaelt zusaetzlich facets (verfuegbare Filterwerte) zum Verfeinern. Read-only, Kauf beim verlinkten Haendler (Affiliate, Preis unveraendert). Finds the cheapest current price in Germany for pool across Amazon, eBay and AliExpress; returns best price, price trend, filter attributes and a direct link.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| brand | No | Auf eine Marke einschraenken (exakter Wert aus facets.marke, z.B. "Nike"). | |
| limit | No | Maximale Anzahl Ergebnisse (Default 24, max 100). | |
| query | No | Suchbegriff, z.B. Modell/Marke/Eigenschaft ("Balkonkraftwerk 800W", "iPhone 15 schwarz"). Optional. | |
| maxPrice | No | Hoechstpreis in EUR (optional). | |
| minPrice | No | Mindestpreis in EUR (optional). |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| site | No | |
| count | Yes | |
| query | No | |
| facets | No | Verfuegbare Filter-Werte (Marke + domain-spezifische Attribute) mit Trefferzahlen — zum gezielten Nachfiltern via query/brand/minPrice/maxPrice. |
| products | Yes | |
| updatedAt | No | |
| disclosure | No | |
| catalogVersion | No |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate readOnlyHint, destructiveHint false, idempotentHint true. The description adds that the tool is read-only and mentions affiliate links and that the price is unchanged. No contradictions; description enriches behavioral context beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with the main purpose and includes necessary details. It is moderately concise, though it mixes languages and could be slightly shorter without losing value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description explains output fields in detail (title, best price, brand, image, price trend, attributes, links, facets). Given the presence of an output schema, the description fully covers what the tool returns and how to use filters, making it complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description mentions filterable fields (query, brand, price range) and facets for refinement, but does not add new meaning beyond what the schema already provides for each parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: to find the cheapest current price in Germany for 'pool' across Amazon, eBay, and AliExpress, with price comparison. It distinguishes from the sibling 'lookup_product' by focusing on price search versus product lookup.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly instructs when to use the tool: when a user asks about price, offer, cheap, where to buy, or a specific pool. However, it does not provide explicit 'when not to use' guidance or mention alternative tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!