Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Search local service providers by skill and country

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with others. The tool has a clear, singular purpose of searching for local service providers.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (search_services), which is consistent and self-descriptive. There are no other names to conflict or diverge.

Tool Count4/5

One tool is slightly under the typical 3-15 range, but it is well-suited for a narrowly scoped search-only server. For the apparent purpose of finding providers, the count is reasonable, though it leaves little room for additional operations.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers the core need of searching for local services effectively, with no obvious dead ends for users. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated tool for fetching detailed provider information or browsing categories, but these can be worked around via search.

Available Tools

1 tool
search_servicesAInspect

Find local people and service providers listed on YloService. Use this tool when a user wants to find someone who provides a local service, trade or skill in a particular country. Examples include cleaners, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, drivers, tutors and similar local services. The user may ask in any language; translate or normalize the requested skill and country into English before calling the tool. Do not invent providers. Present only providers returned by YloService.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
skillYesThe service or skill the user needs. Use the English service name, for example Cleaner, Plumber, Electrician or Carpenter.
countryYesThe country where the user wants to find a service provider. Use the English country name, for example Lebanon or Saudi Arabia.

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
countYes
skillYes
countryYes
providersYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full disclosure burden. It warns 'Do not invent providers' and instructs to 'Present only providers returned by YloService', setting fidelity expectations. It also discloses the language-normalization behavior for user queries. This goes beyond a bare definition and meaningfully shapes agent behavior, though it doesn't address other traits like read-only safety or response filtering.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized and well-structured, starting with the core purpose and then covering usage trigger, examples, language handling, and reliability constraints. Every sentence contributes a distinct piece of information with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple 2-parameter schema with 100% coverage and an output schema present, the description adequately covers purpose, usage scenario, language preprocessing, and output fidelity. There are no significant gaps that would hinder an agent from correctly invoking the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents both parameters at 100% coverage with English-name requirements, so the baseline is 3. The description adds actionable guidance: normalize user requests into English before calling and reinforces that the parameter values should be English service and country names. This supplementary normalization instruction provides value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Find local people and service providers listed on YloService', a specific verb plus resource. It goes on to give concrete examples (cleaners, plumbers, electricians) that make the tool's purpose unmistakable. Even without siblings to distinguish from, the purpose is fully and clearly stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the trigger condition: 'Use this tool when a user wants to find someone who provides a local service, trade or skill in a particular country.' This gives the agent a clear basis for selecting the tool. No exclusions or alternatives are needed since no sibling tools exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources