page-extract
Server Details
URL to clean article markdown/text + metadata and links. Deterministic. $0.001/call via x402.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 3.9/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
With only one tool, there is no possibility for confusion or overlap, so disambiguation is perfect.
Single tool named 'page_extract' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and descriptive.
A single tool for page extraction feels slightly thin for the stated purpose; while it covers the core operation, additional tools for separate text, markdown, or metadata extraction would improve scope.
The tool covers the main extraction task but has notable gaps: it cannot handle JavaScript-rendered pages, and it returns combined content (text, markdown, metadata) in one output, lacking granular extraction options.
Available Tools
1 toolpage_extractAInspect
Fetches a URL and returns clean article text/markdown plus metadata. Deterministic, static HTML only, no JS rendering.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | ||
| format | No |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description discloses deterministic behavior, static HTML only, and no JS rendering. With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden and adequately covers key behavioral traits. It lacks details on error handling or rate limits but is still transparent for a simple fetch operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise: two sentences that front-load the core purpose and then add behavioral constraints. Every word adds value; there is no redundancy or filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and minimal annotations, the description is moderately complete. It explains the basic function and limitations but omits details about the metadata format, error handling, or supported URL schemes. For a simple tool, it suffices but could be more thorough.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions 'markdown' and 'text' which relate to the format parameter, but does not explicitly describe the url parameter or the full enum set. The output description hints at format but adds minimal semantics beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool fetches a URL and returns clean article text/markdown plus metadata. The verb 'fetches' and resource 'URL' are specific, and the output format is explicitly defined. Although there are no sibling tools for differentiation, the description alone provides excellent clarity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No sibling tools exist, so explicit when-to-use vs alternatives is not applicable. The description implies usage for extracting clean text from URLs but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use or not use this tool, earning a baseline score for minimal guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!