Skip to main content
Glama

hts-classify

Server Details

Classifies products into HS/HTS customs codes for import/export workflows. $0.03/call via x402.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.8/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of ambiguity or confusion with other tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming is trivially consistent; the imperative verb 'classify' clearly describes the action.

Tool Count5/5

A single tool is appropriate for the narrow, focused purpose of classifying product descriptions into HS/HTS codes.

Completeness5/5

The tool fully covers the core functionality implied by the server name, including deterministic retrieval and confidence scoring, and explicitly notes its limitations.

Available Tools

1 tool
classifyAInspect

Classify a product description into candidate HS/HTS10 tariff codes. Deterministic BM25 retrieval over the USITC HTS schedule with heading-agreement boosting, returning the full parent-chain description, general duty rate, and a score-gap confidence per candidate. Not a customs ruling — always includes a disclaimer to verify with a licensed broker.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
optionsNo
descriptionYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It describes the operation as 'deterministic BM25 retrieval' and lists return fields, implying a safe, read-only nature. It explicitly states 'Not a customs ruling', adding transparency. No contradictions; however, it does not explicitly confirm no side effects or auth requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loaded with purpose, method, and output details, followed by a disclaimer. No superfluous information; each sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's output and disclaimer but omits parameter details and prerequisites. Given no output schema, the return fields are described. However, the lack of parameter semantics reduces completeness for a tool with two parameters (one optional nested object).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description offers no explanation of parameters. 'description' is required but no guidance on what constitutes a valid product description. 'options.top_k' and 'options.origin_hint' are entirely undocumented. Users must rely on parameter names alone, which is insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Classify a product description into candidate HS/HTS10 tariff codes.' It specifies the verb 'classify', the resource 'product description', and the domain 'HS/HTS10 codes', with details on the retrieval method (BM25) and output elements (parent-chain, duty rate, confidence). This is specific and distinguishes it from generic classification tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates usage for obtaining tariff code candidates and includes a disclaimer that it is not a customs ruling, advising verification with a licensed broker. It lacks explicit when-not-to-use notes or alternative tool comparisons, but the disclaimer provides sufficient context for appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources