Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Diagnose x402 seller endpoints: what is wrong with your 402 challenge, and how to fix it.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership by verifying the domain or GitHub account it belongs to. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Uptime
100.0% over the last 24 hours
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP · MCP 2024-11-05
URL
Repository
tsharpe2282-web/twelve-permissions
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
twelve-permissions
ChatGPT
–
Claude
–

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: probe_x402_endpoint performs the actual endpoint test, list_checks provides the rule table, and explain_defect offers detailed explanations for a specific rule. No overlap or ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (explain_defect, list_checks, probe_x402_endpoint), making the naming predictable and easy to understand.

Tool Count5/5

With three tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose: probe to test, list to see all rules, explain to get details on a specific rule. The count is appropriate without being too thin or excessive.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers the full workflow for x402 endpoint diagnosis: testing the endpoint, listing all possible checks, and explaining any defect. There are no obvious gaps—the combination of probe, list, and explain is complete for the domain.

Available Tools

3 tools
explain_defectBInspect

Full explanation of one rule by id — what it checks, why it matters, how to fix it, and where the rule came from. Use when you want the reasoning without re-probing.

Inputs: id (required).

list_checksBInspect

The whole rule table. Knowing what was NOT checked is part of knowing what a clean result means.

Inputs: no named parameters.

probe_x402_endpointAInspect

Probe an x402 seller endpoint and report what it observes about it. Performs the handshake a paying client would: GET with no X-PAYMENT header, then checks the 402 challenge against 16 rules. Every finding says whether the rule comes from the x402 spec or from an observed facilitator rejection. Reports status "healthy" (nothing to report), "advisories" (only warn/info findings — the endpoint works), "defects_found" (at least one error-severity finding), "not_x402" or "unreachable".

Inputs: url (required).

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents and IDE assistants to validate x402 payment endpoints without shelling out: it fetches a URL unpaid and returns a conformance report on the returned 402 challenge, decodes and classifies base64 payment blobs, and summarises which scheme/network pairs a facilitator can settle.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Before an AI agent pays an x402 endpoint, checks whether it's safe to pay: liveness, scam/anomaly scan (payTo hijack, bait-and-switch, honeypot), and on-chain receiver verification. ~70% of x402 endpoints are dead or scams.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A one-command paywall for local servers that enables testing AI agents' payment flows by simulating HTTP 402 Payment Required responses. It proxies requests with valid payment headers to the actual server, making it easy to develop and test x402 client logic without real blockchain transactions.
      4 npm
      MIT
    Try in Browser

    Glama MCP Gateway

    Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.