Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Forecasts, climate history, severe alerts by location — for outdoor-event planners.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

Single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (get_weather), and consistency is not an issue with only one tool.

Tool Count4/5

One tool is minimal but covers the primary weather use case (current and forecast). Could be expanded slightly, but not inappropriate.

Completeness3/5

The tool provides current conditions and forecast, which covers the main needs. However, missing features like units specification, historical data, or alerts are notable gaps.

Available Tools

1 tool
get_weatherA
Read-only
Inspect

Get current weather and forecast for a location. Returns conditions, temperature, humidity, wind, and multi-day forecast.

Args: location: City name or coordinates (e.g. 'London, UK', 'New York, NY', '37.7749,-122.4194')

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
locationYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral context beyond the annotations (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint) by listing returned fields (conditions, temperature, etc.). It does not contradict annotations. Disclosure is good but could mention if any rate limits or data freshness info exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: two sentences and a parameter line. Every sentence adds value, and the key purpose is front-loaded. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description adequately explains what it returns. It could specify forecast duration (e.g., number of days), but 'multi-day' is sufficient. Annotations cover safety and open-world aspects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds essential meaning to the single parameter 'location' by giving examples of formats (city names, coordinates). This fully compensates for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function ('Get current weather and forecast') and specifies the resource (weather for a location). It uses a specific verb and resource, and with no sibling tools, there is no need for differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (for getting weather) but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives or when not to use. Given no siblings, this is acceptable but not exemplary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources