Super Webmaster

The three tools map roughly to launch → poll → inspect, but resultat_audit already returns the top 3 corrections in full while detail_correction returns details of one of those same 3 corrections, creating genuine overlap. The descriptions clarify sequencing (audit ID handoff), but an agent could still reach for the wrong tool when it just wants a correction's pages.

Names are all lowercase snake_case in French, which is readable, but the pattern mixes a verb form (auditer_site) with noun compounds (resultat_audit, detail_correction). The recurring 'audit' stem across auditer_site and resultat_audit further blurs the verb/noun distinction.

Three tools is thin for a webmaster auditing product, but each corresponds to a real step in a single linear workflow, so nothing is redundant. It sits at the borderline where the surface feels minimal rather than well-scoped.

The core lifecycle (start audit, check progress/results, drill into a correction) is covered with no dead ends for the happy path. However, only 3 corrections are reachable programmatically, and there is no way to list or re-open past audits, cancel a run, or export results, forcing agents to the web bilan.