Skip to main content
Glama

Stratalize Crypto & DeFi

Server Details

Crypto and DeFi benchmarks: gas fees, chain TVL, stablecoin yields, options IV, and correlations.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly to provide an overview and catalog of other tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool named 'get_stratalize_overview', the naming is consistent and descriptive of its function.

Tool Count1/5

The server claims to offer 194 tools but exposes only one meta-tool. This is a severe mismatch between the server's advertised scope and the actual MCP tool surface, making it inappropriate.

Completeness1/5

The server provides no direct functional tools; it only returns a catalog. Agents cannot perform any crypto or DeFi actions without additional infrastructure, leaving the surface extremely incomplete.

Available Tools

1 tool
get_stratalize_overviewA
Read-only
Inspect

START HERE - Returns the complete Stratalize tool catalog: 194 governed MCP tools across 6 namespaces (crypto, finance, governance, healthcare, realestate, intelligence). 72 tools available via x402 (USDC micropayments on Base): $0.02 atomic · $0.10 benchmark · $0.50 synthesis · $1.00 premium; 60 priced tier tools + 12 free reference tools. 64 additional tools accessible via OAuth-authenticated MCP for organizations. Call this first to discover C-suite briefs (CEO, CFO, CRO, CMO, CTO, CHRO, CX, GC, COO), market benchmarks, governance compliance tools (EU AI Act, FS AI RMF, UK FCA), and org intelligence with role-based recommendations. No auth required.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds context beyond annotations by detailing the tool's safe nature (no auth required) and the structure of its output (catalog breakdown, pricing tiers). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is verbose but highly informative. It front-loads with 'START HERE' and lists details in a structured manner. However, it could be more concise; some sentences are dense. Every sentence earns its place, but readability could improve.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, the description fully explains the tool's functionality: namespaces, tool counts, pricing tiers, and specific use cases. It covers all necessary context for an agent to understand when and why to call this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so baseline is 4. The description adds meaning by explaining what the tool returns, compensating for the lack of parameter guidance. It enriches the agent's understanding of the output.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Returns the complete Stratalize tool catalog' and details the scope (194 tools, 6 namespaces). It serves as the entry point, which is explicitly emphasized with 'START HERE'. This distinguishes it from any potential siblings, though none are listed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly advises 'Call this first' and provides context on what to discover (C-suite briefs, benchmarks, compliance tools). It also notes 'No auth required'. While it doesn't specify when not to use, the guidance is clear for a discovery tool with no siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources