Skyalo Travel Connectivity Guide
Server Details
Estimate mobile-data needs and build a provider-neutral connectivity checklist for any trip.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 4.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined.
With only one tool, naming consistency is not a concern. The tool name 'build_travel_connectivity_guide' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.
The server has a single tool for generating a travel connectivity guide. While the tool appears comprehensive, the count feels thin for a guide service that might benefit from additional tools (e.g., for different regions or updates).
The tool covers the primary creation functionality, but lacks supporting operations such as retrieving, updating, or managing guides. The surface is incomplete for a full lifecycle around travel connectivity guides.
Available Tools
1 toolbuild_travel_connectivity_guideBuild a travel connectivity guideARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Creates a free, provider-neutral mobile-data estimate and readiness checklist for a travel route. Use it for data budgeting, device preparation, hotspot planning, offline readiness, and connection fallback advice. It does not browse, compare, promote, recommend, price, sell, or link to products, plans, carriers, or connectivity services.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| stops | Yes | One to eight destinations in travel order. | |
| locale | No | BCP 47 language tag for the requested guide. | en |
| hotspot | No | Whether one or more travelers expect to share data by hotspot. | |
| travelers | No | Travelers who need connectivity. | |
| usageProfile | No | light for maps and messaging, balanced for everyday use, heavy for frequent media, or remote-work for calls and laptop work. | balanced |
| deviceReadiness | No | confirmed when eSIM support and unlocked status are known, unsure when unverified, or not-supported when the device cannot use eSIM. | unsure |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| stops | Yes | |
| status | Yes | |
| summary | Yes | |
| limitations | Yes | |
| riskSignals | Yes | |
| safeFallbacks | Yes | |
| questionsToConfirm | Yes | |
| readinessChecklist | Yes |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, which align with generating a guide (not mutating data). The description adds behavioral context like 'free', 'provider-neutral', and explicitly lists what the tool does not do, enhancing transparency beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is exceptionally concise with two sentences: the first states the core function, the second lists use cases and exclusions. It is front-loaded and every sentence adds value without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (6 parameters, output schema present), the description covers the purpose, use cases, and limitations completely. It does not need to explain return values as an output schema is available.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the parameter descriptions already present. The description implies connections to parameters (e.g., 'hotspot planning' relates to the 'hotspot' parameter) but does not explicitly elaborate on each parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it creates a provider-neutral mobile-data estimate and readiness checklist for travel routes, listing specific use cases. It also explicitly states what it does not do, distinguishing its purpose effectively.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description lists several use cases (data budgeting, device preparation, etc.) to imply when to use, but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives. However, the absence of sibling tools reduces the need for such differentiation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!