Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

Sitecomb

by com.sitecomb
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Server Details

A quality score out of 100 for any website, plus the areas that need work.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership by verifying the domain or GitHub account it belongs to. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Uptime
100.0% over the last 24 hours
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
URL
ChatGPT
–
Claude
Sitecomb

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools are clearly distinct: check_website performs an audit and returns a score, while explain_area only describes what one of the six areas means and explicitly does not check any site. There is no plausible overlap that could cause misselection.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both names follow the same verb_noun snake_case pattern (check_website, explain_area), with concrete objects rather than vague verbs. The convention is consistent and readable.

Tool Count3/5

Two tools is thin for a website-audit service: the entire product surface is reduced to one runnable check plus one static glossary lookup. It is borderline rather than mismatched, since the server may be intentionally minimal, but agents have very little to compose.

Completeness2/5

The audit tool deliberately omits the actual problem names ('those are in the full report'), and no tool retrieves that full report, so agents hit a dead end when asked what specifically is wrong. There is also no way to list areas, retrieve past checks, or compare results across time.

Available Tools

2 tools
check_websiteCheck a websiteA
Read-onlyIdempotent
Inspect

Checks a public website with Sitecomb. It returns a website quality score out of 100 and the areas that have problems, with a count for each. It does not name the problems: those are in the full report. Use it when someone asks whether their website is any good, or what is wrong with it. Also use it when someone asks why their website isn't working for them, or asks to check or audit a website. It looks at six areas: security, privacy and legal signals, page health, works on phones, contact details and found online. A check loads the site the way a visitor's browser does and takes up to about a minute. It only finds problems; it never changes anything on the site. If the site is down or blocks automatic checks, it says it couldn't check and gives no quality score. Free checks are limited per person and per website each day.

Inputs: url (required).

explain_areaExplain a Sitecomb areaA
Read-onlyIdempotent
Inspect

Explains what Sitecomb looks at in one of its six areas, by id: security, privacy, quality (page health), phones, customers or ai. Use it when someone asks what Sitecomb checks, or about an area named in a check_website result. It doesn't check any website.

Inputs: area (required).

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • polaris-audit

      cnohall
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Audit any website for privacy, security, accessibility, and performance issues — with scores, grades, and actionable fix instructions. No account required.
      3
      11 npm
      MIT

    • website-audit

      rolledoatmeals
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables auditing any public website, returning a scored plain-English report that flags issues costing customers, covering speed, phone experience, search visibility, contact options, writing quality, and modernity.
      1
      MIT
    Try in Browser
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    Glama MCP Gateway

    Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

    Resources