Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Verified doc corpora for agents: grep-first retrieval, hashed pages, Merkle+RFC-3161 receipts

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Long-term memory for AI agents. Compiles conversations into a structured knowledge base with Claim/Evidence model, source provenance, append-only timeline, and contradiction detection. Multi-path retrieval (Exact + BM25 + Graph + weighted RRF + reranker) — 96.6% R@5 on LongMemEval-S, zero vector dependencies.
    8
    3
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Local-first memory for AI agents with evidence-backed recall, deterministic trust verdicts, self-inspection, and a tamper-evident audit history.
    3
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Verifiable document intelligence for AI agents. Extract, summarize, claim-check, and notarize PDFs & URLs with cryptographic proofs, cross-document search, and on-chain attestation via Base L2.
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Verifiable action receipts for AI agents — agents sign claims locally, an independent witness countersigns and timestamps, anyone can verify offline.
    14
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct aspect: reading different content types (fetch, read_md, read_facts), searching (search, grep_corpus, glob_corpus), listing (list_dir, list_indexes), diffs and changelog (diff_md, changed_since), proofs (prove), metadata query (query_manifest), and status (snapshot_status). No overlap.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_dir, read_md, grep_corpus). A few are single verbs (fetch, search, prove) but still clear. The naming is largely consistent with minor deviations.

Tool Count5/5

13 tools cover the read-only library domain well: reading, searching, listing, diffing, proving, and status. The scope is well-defined without unnecessary tools.

Completeness4/5

The tool set is quite complete for a read-only library, offering multiple access patterns (by path, ID, pattern, search, changes). Missing are tools to list snapshots or get full corpus structure, but these are minor gaps.

Resources