amazon
Server Details
Validate Amazonbot and Amzn-SearchBot IP addresses. Remote MCP validate_ip tool.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 3.9/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion. The tool's purpose is clear and distinct.
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('validate_ip'), consistent and descriptive.
One tool is appropriate for this narrow, single-purpose operation (IP validation). While a single tool can feel thin, the scope is tightly focused.
The tool fully covers its intended domain: validating an IP address against Amazonbot's published data. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.
Available Tools
1 toolvalidate_ipValidate Amazonbot IPAInspect
Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine Amazonbot IP address, verified against Amazonbot's published IP data on seoapi.com.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ip | Yes | The IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It adds valuable context by stating the verification source (Amazonbot's published IP data on seoapi.com), indicating the tool performs an external lookup. However, it does not disclose potential latency, rate limits, or what happens on failure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-structured sentence that conveys all essential information without extraneous words. It is front-loaded with the core action and provides specificity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple 1-parameter tool with no output schema, the description tells the purpose and data source. However, it omits what the tool returns (e.g., boolean, status message), which is important for an agent to understand the output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The tool description repeats that the IP can be IPv4 or IPv6, which is already in the schema's property description. It adds no new meaning about the parameter beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: to check if an IP address is a genuine Amazonbot IP, verified against published data. It specifies IPv4 and IPv6 and the data source, making the purpose unambiguous even without siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use (when needing to verify an IP against Amazonbot's list), but provides no explicit guidance on when not to use or any prerequisites. No siblings exist to differentiate, so the clarity is adequate but not explicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Servers
- Alicense-qualityBmaintenanceProvides MCP tools for IP threat intelligence lookup and enrichment, including single IP lookup, bulk hunting, ASN expansion, and feed status queries.Last updatedMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEmail validation MCP server using MailboxValidator API to determine validity of an email address.Last updated3451MIT
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing IP address lookup capabilities. Enables AI assistants to fetch details about public IP addresses or the user's current device IP.Last updated226ISC
- Flicense-qualityDmaintenanceComprehensive email validation MCP server that checks syntax, MX records, disposable domains, role-based accounts, SPF/DKIM, typo suggestions, and risk scoring.Last updated