RealWorldAPIs

Compare 2–8 already-known APIs side by side using canonical catalog fields plus capability-graph summary fields such as verified capability count, physical consequences, approval relevance and irreversibility. Use get_api for the full decision profile of one API and search_capabilities for capability-level filtering. No missing value is inferred and Unknown remains Unknown.

Propose a planning-only API workflow from 1–8 structured steps. Include the complete original goal and restrictions. Returns canonical candidates, evidence, Unknown requirements and bounded alternatives. Does not draft with AI, verify execution readiness, implement processing or execute provider operations.

Find the best APIs for a natural-language physical-world task. Use this for open-ended task or outcome-based recommendations; use search_apis when you already know exact filters, get_api for one known API, or compare_apis for known candidates. Returns an authoritative canonical structured_results shortlist plus a best-effort AI comparison restricted to that shortlist. The canonical engine now applies Verified/High capability evidence before ranking: explicit hard requirements expressed with terms such as must, required, no or without can exclude a candidate only when verified evidence contradicts them. Unknown evidence remains eligible and is surfaced as uncertainty. requirements.mcp, openapi and auth are translated into explicit requirements; categories and capabilities remain task-shaping hints. free_tier and min_readiness are accepted for compatibility but are not hard filters.

Retrieve one canonical API decision profile when you already know its name or slug. The response includes the full Verified/High capability profile with execution, access, approval, reversibility, physical-consequence and evidence fields. Exact slug or exact API name is preferred; a partial identifier is accepted only when it uniquely resolves to one record.

Search the canonical registry when you already know keywords or exact requirements. All supplied filter groups combine with AND logic; array capability filters require every supplied value, and protocol fields match the exact Yes/No/Unknown status, so Unknown never satisfies Yes. Results include each API's capability_summary and direct decision-profile URL. Results are sorted by agent_readiness_score descending and then API name, with 1–20 results returned (default 10). Use search_capabilities when you need capability-level filters such as approval, physical consequence, sandbox or access friction.

Search the canonical 770-capability Verified/High decision graph directly. Use this when the question is about what an agent can actually do and under what execution conditions: task/capability text, API, category, action type, acted-on object, human approval, physical consequence, irreversibility, sandbox, hardware dependency, access friction or setup. All supplied filter groups combine with AND logic; multiple values inside one array filter are alternatives (OR). Unknown remains Unknown and may be filtered explicitly by passing the literal value Unknown.

Verify whether one specific API can satisfy one exact requirement using the canonical Verified/High capability graph plus linked assertion evidence. Returns YES, NO, PARTIAL or UNKNOWN with matched capability, access/setup prerequisites, approval, safety, reversibility, reliability, coverage and other requested dimensions; direct provider facts remain distinct from inferred policy assertions. Unknown remains Unknown.