ProofLayered
Server Details
Free passive growth-bottleneck scan for B2B SaaS websites: visibility, trust, conversion, scale.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolgrowth_bottleneck_scanAInspect
Free passive scan of a public B2B SaaS website. Returns bottleneck scores (visibility, trust, conversion, scale), the primary public growth blocker, and top fix priorities. Passive only: no credentials, no production access. Full signed diagnosis with deploy-ready fix packs is a flat $490 at prooflayered.com/app.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Public company URL, e.g. https://example.com |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description fully carries the burden. It clearly states the tool is passive, requires no credentials or production access, and scans only public websites. This discloses all relevant behavioral traits for an agent to use safely.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, no redundancy. Front-loaded with the tool's purpose and key outputs, then adds behavioral constraints. Every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers everything needed: what it does, its passive nature, and what it returns. No gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter 'url' has a schema description that already explains it. The description adds no additional semantic meaning beyond the schema. With 100% schema coverage, baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it performs a 'free passive scan of a public B2B SaaS website' and specifies the outputs: bottleneck scores, primary growth blocker, and fix priorities. The verb 'scan' and resource 'public B2B SaaS website' are specific and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly notes it is 'passive only: no credentials, no production access,' setting clear usage boundaries. It also mentions the paid full diagnosis option as an alternative, but does not exclude other potential use cases due to lack of sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Free AI visibility scan for any B2B company: see how often AI engines recommend it, plus the fixes.
Scan any website's AI readiness: AI search visibility and AI agent usability. Free, no auth.
LLM SEO and Agent Discoverability for B2B SaaS. Pricing, fit assessment, audit requests.
Scan websites for AI visibility and marketing health with interactive dashboard.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables scanning any website for AI agent compatibility and marketing health, returning interactive dashboard reports with scores and revenue impact estimates.
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePassive website security and trust auditor that checks for security, SEO, AI surface, email, and other exposures, producing a score and remediation plan.
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to scan any website for AI search visibility, producing AEO, GEO, agent readiness, and mention-readiness scores along with AI identity and business profile insights. Paid tools extend this to competitive comparisons, detailed audits, and generated fixes.41MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEvaluates any website's AI visibility with 15 checks across crawlability, structure, content, and connectivity, and provides actionable fixes.10MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no risk of confusion. The tool's purpose is clearly described and distinct by default.
A single tool named 'growth_bottleneck_scan' follows a clear verb_noun pattern consistent with itself.
One tool is borderline for a server; while the tool is not trivial, the scope feels thin. A few more tools (e.g., for viewing past scans) would be expected.
The server offers only a single scan operation. Missing lifecycle operations like listing, retrieving, or managing scans. The user is directed to an external site for paid results, creating a dead end.