PrimeReviewsPro Fake Review Checker
Server Details
Detect fake or manipulated product reviews from Amazon, Trustpilot, Google and Etsy.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolcheck_reviewsCheck product reviews for fakesARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Check whether a product's reviews look fake or manipulated. Paste at least 3 reviews (Amazon, Trustpilot, Google or Etsy), each separated by a BLANK LINE. Returns how many reviews read as real / suspicious / fake, an overall fake-percentage, a risk level, the manipulation signals found, and a per-review verdict. Read-only and free, no signup. If the call fails, report that the check could not be completed - do not invent a verdict.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| asin | No | Optional Amazon ASIN for reference. | |
| reviews_text | Yes | At least 3 reviews, each separated by a BLANK LINE (double newline). |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnly, openWorld, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior; the description adds 'free, no signup' and an explicit instruction not to invent a verdict on failure. This goes beyond the structured annotations without contradicting them.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is compact and front-loaded with purpose, followed by input requirements, output summary, and failure handling. Every sentence carries useful information with no filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description compensates by enumerating the returned verdicts and metrics. It also covers input formatting, supported sources, cost/signup expectations, and failure behavior, making the tool fully callable by an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters well. The description adds minor context like supported platforms and reinforces blank-line separation, but it does not significantly expand on the parameter semantics already present.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific action ('Check whether a product's reviews look fake or manipulated'), names the supported sources, and clarifies what the tool returns. It is unambiguous even without sibling tools to distinguish against.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It gives clear invocation context: at least 3 reviews, supported platforms, blank-line separation, and a fallback instruction if the call fails. There are no sibling tools to contrast with, so explicit when-not-to-use guidance is not required.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
check_reviews
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
- monitoringOAuthcom.repuso
Google reviews API - fetch reviews from Google, Trustpilot, TripAdvisor, G2 + 50 platforms
G2, Trustpilot, Yelp reviews with sentiment and theme extraction across sources.
Amazon Reviews Scraper extracts ratings, review text, author, date, verified purchase status…
AI-powered scam detection for suspicious texts, emails, and screenshots. US-focused.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables retrieval of Trustpilot reviews as structured JSON, including ratings, dates, replies, and company metrics, with MCP support for AI agents.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides cited product-review verdicts synthesised from real user voices across multiple platforms, enabling AI agents to query live opinions with ratings, pros/cons, and confidence tiers.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAgent-native Amazon review intelligence — fetches verified reviews from 10 marketplaces via real Shulex OpenAPI (not scrapers) and produces copy-ready listing improvements grounded in actual customer language. Backed by a 2B-review historical dataset that Helium 10 / Jungle Scout can't replicate. Works in any MCP client (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Cline).633MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables fetching structured JSON reviews from G2 product pages, including ratings, pros/cons, reviewer details, and optional product metadata.-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity between tools. The purpose is singular and clearly defined.
The single tool name 'check_reviews' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, consistent with best practices. There are no other tools to conflict with.
One tool feels thin for a server, but it is a focused single-purpose utility. It is on the borderline between acceptable and under-scoped.
The tool fully covers the stated purpose of checking reviews for manipulation. Minor gaps include lack of URL-based checking or batch processing, but the core workflow is complete.