Skip to main content
Glama
Ownership verified

Server Details

LinkedIn outreach, commenting, scheduling, and data via Claude and human approval gates.

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsD

Average 2.5/5 across 42 of 42 tools scored. Lowest: 1/5.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation2/5

Many tools have overlapping purposes, especially the draft management tools (e.g., approve_draft vs approve_comment_draft, list_drafts vs list_comment_drafts) which create ambiguity. The four LinkedIn connection methods are all distinct but could be confusing. Overall, an agent would struggle to consistently pick the right tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming convention is largely consistent snake_case with verb_noun pattern (e.g., approve_comment_draft, get_linkedin_profile). Minor deviations like cancel_scheduled (verb_adjective) and schedule_manual_dm (longer noun phrase) but no style mixing. Very readable.

Tool Count3/5

42 tools is on the high side for a LinkedIn automation server. While the scope is broad, many tools are redundantly split by draft type (comment, content, general). The count feels heavy but not extreme; a more consolidated design would improve coherence.

Completeness3/5

Core workflows (connection, prospect discovery, outreach, commenting, scheduling, account management) are covered, but there are notable gaps: no ability to manually create a draft, no permanent delete for drafts, no immediate send message (only scheduled), and no sequence management beyond creation. The surface is workable but incomplete.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources