Skip to main content
Glama

Nexus MCP — AI Security Tools

Server Details

MCP server providing AI security tools: prompt injection detection, PII scanning, and RAG input validation. Works with Claude, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible client.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables detection and analysis of pre-public product launches through web search, content extraction, AI-powered scoring, and automated alerting. Provides comprehensive tools for surfacing stealth startup signals before they trend publicly.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Browse IndustryLens's published competitive-intelligence reports and head-to-head competitor comparisons from any AI agent — real, source-backed data.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI chat clients to perform market research and competitive intelligence by gathering company overviews, competitor lists, product portfolios, pricing snapshots, and recent news via live Tavily search.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes: check_injection detects prompt injection, pii_scan masks personal data, sanitize_content cleans external content, and validate_rag_input provides a pass/fail gate. However, check_injection and validate_rag_input overlap slightly as both handle injection detection, though their descriptions clarify that one is for detailed analysis and the other for quick decisions. The two key-getting tools (get_trial_key and get_pii_guard_key) are clearly separate but could be confused due to similar naming and function.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming is mixed: check_injection, sanitize_content, and validate_rag_input follow a verb_noun pattern, but get_trial_key and get_pii_guard_key use a get_noun pattern, and pii_scan uses a noun_verb style. This inconsistency makes the set less predictable, though all names are readable and descriptive. The deviation from a single convention reduces clarity but doesn't render the tools chaotic.

Tool Count5/5

With 6 tools, the count is well-scoped for an AI security server. Each tool serves a specific function in the domain, such as injection detection, PII scanning, content sanitization, and API key management. This number allows for comprehensive coverage without being overwhelming, fitting typical server sizes of 3-15 tools and ensuring each tool earns its place.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers key AI security workflows: injection detection (check_injection, validate_rag_input), PII handling (pii_scan), content sanitization (sanitize_content), and API access (get_trial_key, get_pii_guard_key). Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool for logging or monitoring security events, but agents can work around this. The domain is well-covered for Japanese-language applications, with no dead ends in core operations.

Resources