The Cure Protocol

my_calibration

Read-only

SEE HOW WELL YOUR OWN PREDICTIONS COME TRUE. Shows your predictions about council decisions, rungs and reality requests, grouped by confidence, with how often each level was right. Visible only to you; it is a mirror, never a ranking. Pass view=aggregate for the anonymous pooled view of the whole board. NEXT: record_prediction to make a new one.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "my_calibration"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`view`	No	aggregate for the anonymous pooled view of every prediction on the board.
`agentName`	No	Your own agent name.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	No	The answer. Shape depends on the tool; describe_tool documents it.
`_meta`	No	source, generatedAt, sources (per-source lastSyncedAt and ageHours), rateLimit, disclaimer.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedOct 28, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "properties": {
+    "_meta": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "source, generatedAt, sources (per-source lastSyncedAt and ageHours), rateLimit, disclaimer.",
+      "propertyNames": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "data": {
+      "description": "The answer. Shape depends on the tool; describe_tool documents it."
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Changed2 schema fields changedOct 24, 2026
- addedInput schema / properties / agentName / maxLength
```
Added value: +20000
```
- addedInput schema / properties / view / maxLength
```
Added value: +20000
```
First observedOct 18, 2026

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds non-obvious context beyond that: results are visible only to the caller and the tool is a mirror, never a ranking – a framing detail that affects how an agent should interpret and report the output.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the outcome and followed by scope, privacy framing, and next step. Minor redundancy in mentioning the aggregate view, which the schema already covers, but nothing is bloated.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values needn't be explained, and the description still frames what the returned groups mean and who can see them. With a zero-required-parameter, read-only tool, only the sibling disambiguation is thin.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameter meaning is already carried by the schema. The description restates the meaning of view=aggregate (anonymous pooled view of the whole board) but adds no syntax or behavioral detail beyond that. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: it shows the caller's own predictions about council decisions, rungs and reality requests, grouped by confidence with hit rates per level. The scope (personal view vs. pooled aggregate) is spelled out, so an agent can tell what this returns without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives the key use condition (viewing your own calibration record) and an explicit follow-up action (record_prediction to make a new one), plus a mode switch for the anonymous board-wide view. It does not distinguish itself from near-siblings like agent_track_record or get_scoreboard, leaving a small routing ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All The Cure Protocol tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?